Hi,
I would like to apply the following patch:
[PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
It is a backend only change to our existing -mhotpatch feature
requested by the Linux kernel guys for the ftrace implementation:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/32
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to apply the following patch:
>
> [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
>
> It is a backend only change to our existing -mhotpatch feature
> requested by the Linux kernel guys fo
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > I would like to apply the following patch:
> >
> > [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
> >
> > It is a backend only change to our
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > > I would like to apply the following patch:
> > >
> > > [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/ms
On 01/27/2015 10:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to apply the following patch:
>>
>> [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
>>
>> It is a backend only change to our existing -mh
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > > > [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > > > > [PATCH] S/390
For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
I the only one who has experienced it?
--
H.J.
On 27 January 2015 at 16:02, H.J. Lu wrote:
> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
> I the only one who has experienced it?
No, everyone sees it. Spammers are trying to write to the wiki or
something and are DOSing the ma
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
> I the only one who has experienced it?
I got some timeouts while updating my glibc git repo yesterday.
I had never run into that b
On January 27, 2015 10:04:51 AM CST, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
>On 27 January 2015 at 16:02, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
>> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
>> I the only one who has experienced it?
>
>No, everyone sees it. Spamm
On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
I the only one who has experienced it?
I got some timeouts while updating my glibc git repo y
On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
I the only one who has experienced it?
I got some timeouts while updating my glibc git repo y
Manuel López-Ibáñez :
> On 26 January 2015 at 19:15, Martin Uecker wrote:
> >
> > Since my patch to change this has been accepted, could you please
> > update the FAQ again?
>
> Done. Moreover, if you create a wiki account, I will grant you editing powers.
thank you, I tried creating an accou
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:36 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
> >> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
> >> I the only one who has exp
Hi,
Am David Edward Cleasby, Group financial director of Bidvest Bank. I will like
discuss an Inheritance deal with you which be of help to both of us, if
interested kindly reply to: davideclea...@gmail.com for more details.
On 27 January 2015 at 18:31, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
>
> Manuel López-Ibáñez :
>
>> On 26 January 2015 at 19:15, Martin Uecker wrote:
>> >
>> > Since my patch to change this has been accepted, could you please
>> > update the FAQ again?
>>
>> Done. Moreover, if you create a wiki account, I will gr
On January 27, 2015 11:39:13 AM CST, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:36 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
>> >> quite slow for me when
On 1/27/2015 1:31 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On January 27, 2015 11:39:13 AM CST, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:36 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.o
Hi -
> > thank you, I tried creating an account, but it said: Unknown action
> > newaccount.
> Frank, do you know what the problem might be?
Yes, this facility was temporarily disabled, as a load-shedding
measure. I'll turn it back on for a few hours.
- FChE
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
>>> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
>>> I the only one who has
Am Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:15:08 -0500
"Frank Ch. Eigler" :
> Hi -
>
> > > thank you, I tried creating an account, but it said: Unknown action
> > > newaccount.
> > Frank, do you know what the problem might be?
>
> Yes, this facility was temporarily disabled, as a load-shedding
> measure. I'll tur
On 01/27/15 14:22, David Edelsohn wrote:
If a new system is procured, we need to perform the transition in a
more timely manner so that the new system is not idle for a year like
last time.
I thought that there was more than one system. Is it possible to
divide the work between multiple systems
Hi All,
I am a beginner of gcc.
My goal of modifying gcc is to maintain two stacks.
One is accessed by rbp, the other is accessed by rsp.
rsp is only used by call/ret. All other accesses (e.g., access parameters,
access local variables)
to stack are via rbp.
For easy implementation, I would
24 matches
Mail list logo
