Hi,
I would like to suggest that new implementation files have
the '.cc' extension, unless they are meant to be processed
with a C compiler. (I am not proposing wholesale renaming.)
-- Gaby
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> GCC can detect at configure time that it will fail. It is clearly
> a computable problem. It's a matter of someone doing it rather than
> insisting that the world should change to suit them.
GCC 4.8.1 will fail to compile on x86_64-unknown-
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:50:53PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:55:38AM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:06:55AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 07:36:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >Make them callee saved means
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 05:44:05PM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:50:53PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:55:38AM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:06:55AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 07:36:3
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:12:57PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> By the way, I do have another horrible idea for how you could do it.
> glibc's jmp_buf is actually a sigjmp_buf and contains 120 wasted bytes
> of sigset_t for nonexistant HURD signals. So you could store a few
> registers after the act
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:12:57PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 05:44:05PM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:50:53PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:55:38AM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> > > You can't add call-saved registers
On 27 July 2013 14:56, David Starner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> GCC can detect at configure time that it will fail. It is clearly
>> a computable problem. It's a matter of someone doing it rather than
>> insisting that the world should change to suit them.
>
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen!
As you can read below, I need some information regarding the development of the
GCC's. Some of the questions below were answered me already but I can not find
any references to the use of formal or semi-formal methods. as
- Logic / functional block diagrams
- Flow char
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:12:57PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 05:44:05PM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:50:53PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:55:38A
On 07/27/2013 08:36 PM, Kiefmann Bernhard wrote:
> As you can read below, I need some information regarding the development of
> the GCC's. Some of the questions below were answered me already but I can not
> find any references to the use of formal or semi-formal methods. as
> - Logic / function
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20130727 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20130727/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 27 July 2013 14:56, David Starner wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> GCC can detect at configure time that it will fail. It is clearly
>>> a computable problem. It's a matter of someone doing it rather
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> It's not "some random package" it's the C library, and it is needed to
> compile 32-bit C programs.
It's not libc6. It's not even libc6-dev. It's libc6-dev-i386. Debian
Popularity Contest says that 84315 out of 147631 are AMD64; 99980
sys
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 6:10 PM, David Starner wrote:
>> If the
>> latter, did you try spelling it correctly, --disable-multilib
>> (singular)?
>
> I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was misspelling it.
Do not feel alone on this one.
-- Gaby
I am having a great deal of trouble getting register elimination (and
stack frame layouts in general) working properly on my architecture.
There is some fundamental issue I'm simply not getting here.
My architecture is a fairly vanilla RISC system with a link pointer. The
stack frame layout I'm ai
15 matches
Mail list logo