Re: OpenACC support in 4.9

2013-05-10 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 10:27 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> > On 05/06/2013 07:41 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> >> >> >> Evgeny Gavrin wrote: >> >>> >> >>> What do you think about support of

Re: OpenACC support in 4.9

2013-05-10 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 12:46 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> >> Richard Biener wrote: >> >>> >> >>> We're going to look

Mode precision and bytesize

2013-05-10 Thread Paulo Matos
Hello, Can someone please clarify the difference between the precision of a mode and its bytesize? Also, if you create a CCMODE and ADJUST it's bytesize to 1, then it's currently impossible to change its precision to 8. You end up with a bytesize of 1 and a precision of 4*BITS_PER_UNITS which

Re: OpenACC support in 4.9

2013-05-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:00:29AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > >> Which > >> means changing the GOMP runtime in a way to be able to pass a descriptor > >> which eventually has accelerator code (and a fallback regular function so > >> you can disable accelerator usage at runtime). > > > > It prob

Re: OpenACC support in 4.9

2013-05-10 Thread Tobias Burnus
Jakub Jelinek wrote: [Fallback generation of CPU code] If one uses the OpenMP 4.0 accelerator pragmas, then that is the required behavior, if the code is for whatever reason not possible to run on the accelerator, it should be executed on host [...] (I haven't checked, but is this a compile time

broken link (and other issues) on the _contribute.html_ page

2013-05-10 Thread Zvi Gilboa
Greetings, On the _/contribute/.html_//page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), the link to the script that should help check conformance with GNU coding style is broken (the root "trunk" is unknown, etc.) Note also that the section "Legal Prerequisites" comes before "Coding Standards." L

_contribute.html_: missing information regarding feedback procedure

2013-05-10 Thread Zvi Gilboa
Greetings, At the very bottom of the above page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), there is no indication of GCC only accepting *plain text* messages. As most mail clients nowadays default to a combined text/html format, this leaves users with the unpleasant experience of having their mes

Re: _contribute.html_: missing information regarding feedback procedure

2013-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 10 May 2013 12:29, Zvi Gilboa wrote: > Greetings, > > At the very bottom of the above page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), > there is no indication of GCC only accepting *plain text* messages. That would belong on http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html but it could be improved, as it only says "Pl

4.8 status on front page

2013-05-10 Thread Kenny Simpson
On http://gcc.gnu.org, the 4.8 status is still pointing to the original release note from 4.8.0. Shouldn't it be updated to the status report on 2013-05-07 ? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00074.html -Kenny