On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:44:12PM -0800, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> >
> >
> > My strong belief is that a compiler project as gigantic as GCC needs some
> > kind
> > of garbage collection
>
> Can you name another compiler written in C/C++ using GC ? :)
First, C or C++ is not the best language to
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> === Approach: Move GTY to cc1plus.
>
> Instead of a separate weak parser, we would make cc1plus
> understand GTY attributes. The compiler would emit IL in the
> object files instead of generating source.
>
> This solution would require a first boot stage
> First, C or C++ is not the best language to write a compiler in,
It is my strong opinion that the best language to write a compiler in is
the language that it is compiling (or the primary language in the case
of a multi-language compiler like GCC).
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 07:03:33AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > First, C or C++ is not the best language to write a compiler in,
>
> It is my strong opinion that the best language to write a compiler in is
> the language that it is compiling (or the primary language in the case
> of a multi-l
On Saturday 17 November 2012 08:34 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 07:03:33AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
First, C or C++ is not the best language to write a compiler in,
It is my strong opinion that the best language to write a compiler in is
the language that it i
Hi,
There is a bad memory access in LTO:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
Should we add an option to bootstrap GCC with asan?
--
H.J.
On 2012.11.17 at 09:37 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a bad memory access in LTO:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
>
> Should we add an option to bootstrap GCC with asan?
I think that's a good idea, but please note that gcc's implementation
doesn't catch this part
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2012 9:37 AM, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is a bad memory access in LTO:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
>>
>> Should we add an option to bootstrap GCC with asan?
>
> Sure. What's the worst
I wrote some time ago:
On Saturday 17 November 2012 09:12 PM, Uday Khedker wrote:
On Saturday 17 November 2012 08:34 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 07:03:33AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
First, C or C++ is not the best language to write a compiler in,
It is my s
You are right, we are talking about the same things. The only open
question I see is regarding:
In other cases we can safely assume
that the executable will be created and
in such case it would be a good idea to use -fPIE.
>> I don't see why it would be a good idea to use -fPIE for
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:44:12PM -0800, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > My strong belief is that a compiler project as gigantic as GCC needs some
>> > kind
>> > of garbage collection
>>
>> Can you name another compiler writ
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> My main point is that other main open source compilers like
> clang/llvm, open64 and some main commercial compilers I know do not
> use GC, which proves that GC is not a must for a compiler to be easy
> to work with or to be a good open
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20121117 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20121117/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
13 matches
Mail list logo
