On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> wrote:

> My main point is that other main open source compilers like
> clang/llvm, open64 and some main commercial compilers I know do not
> use GC, which proves that GC is not a must  for a compiler to be easy
> to work with or to be a good open code analysis framework.

Engaging in a debate about the necessity of GC with Basile is a losing
proposition :-)

I suspect we are off improving the concrete proposal
put forward by Diego and Lawrence.

-- Gaby

Reply via email to