On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> My -fopt-info pass filtering patch
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg02704.html) is being
> reviewed and I hope to get this in by Nov. 5 for inclusion in gcc
> 4.8.0.
I just committed -fopt-info pass filtering pa
On 11/01/2012 10:28 AM, Peter Garbett wrote:
> I am maintaining a private port that I am attempting to port to GCC 4.7.2
>
> With RTL checking enabled, it fails with a message
>
>
> "RTL check: expected code 'reg' have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1090"
>
>
> I assume this is because the
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:52:04AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > My -fopt-info pass filtering patch
> > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg02704.html) is being
> > reviewed and I hope to get this in by Nov. 5
richi,
I would like you to respond to at least point 1 of this email. In it
there is code from the rtl level that was written twice, once for the
case when the size of the mode is less than the size of a HWI and once
for the case where the size of the mode is less that 2 HWIs.
my patch cha
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> How was that change tested? I'm seeing thousands of new UNRESOLVED
> failures, of the form:
> spawn -ignore SIGHUP /usr/src/gcc/obj415/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/gcc/obj415/gcc/
> /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/branch-cost1.c
> -fno-d
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
> I would like you to respond to at least point 1 of this email. In it
> there is code from the rtl level that was written twice, once for the
> case when the size of the mode is less than the size of a HWI and once
> for the case where the size of the mode is less that
On 11/01/2012 09:10 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
I would like you to respond to at least point 1 of this email. In it
there is code from the rtl level that was written twice, once for the
case when the size of the mode is less than the size of a HWI and once
for the ca
anyway richard, it does not answer the question as to what you are going
to do with a typedef foo<2>.
the point of all of this work by me was to leave no traces of the host
in the way the compiler works.
instantiating a specific size of the double-ints is not going to get you
there.
kenny
O
I am really sorry about that. I am looking and will fix the breakage
or revert the patch shortly.
Thanks,
Sharad
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:52:04AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>> >
On 2012-10-31 13:50 , Peter Colberg wrote:
gcc‑lua extends the GNU Compiler Collection with the ability to run Lua
scripts. The plugin provides an interface to register callback functions for
plugin events, and inspect the abstract syntax tree of a translation unit. The
plugin is useful for stat
Richard Sandiford writes:
> As is probably obvious, I don't agree FWIW. It seems like an unnecessary
> complication without any clear use. Especially since the number of
> significant HWIs in a wide_int isn't always going to be the same for
> both operands to a binary operation, and it's not cle
I found the problem and the following patch fixes it. The issue with
my testing was that I was only looking at 'FAIL' lines but forgot to
tally the 'UNRESOLVED' test cases, the real symptoms of my test
problems. In any case, I am rerunning the whole testsuite just to be
sure.
Assuming tests pass
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> I found the problem and the following patch fixes it. The issue with
> my testing was that I was only looking at 'FAIL' lines but forgot to
> tally the 'UNRESOLVED' test cases, the real symptoms of my test
> problems. In any case, I am rer
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>> I found the problem and the following patch fixes it. The issue with
>> my testing was that I was only looking at 'FAIL' lines but forgot to
>> tally the 'UNRESOLVED' test cases, the r
Hi Jakub,
I would like to get the fission implementation in before stage 1. It
has been under review for some time, and is awaiting another round of
review now.
More info here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg02684.html
Sterling
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Address Sanitizer (ASAN) feature and its associated runtime
support library imported from an external repository. Jakub Jelinek,
Dodji Seketeli, Kostya Serebryany, and Dmitry Vyukov have been appointed
co-reviewers.
16 matches
Mail list logo
