On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:54:17AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 10:52 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is the recommended way to skip specific (non target specific)
> > testcases for a subtargets?
> >
> > There are a bunch of tests in the gcc testsuite tha
On 08/11/2012 09:18 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:54:17AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/09/2012 10:52 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What is the recommended way to skip specific (non target specific)
>>> testcases for a subtargets?
>>>
>
Hello Richi,
After a frustrating few days of trying to figure out what *I* was
doing wrong trying to speed up rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa(), I
finally gave up and looked at the rest of GCC. One wouldn't expect
anything to be very broken in an unpatched tree, after all, but the
kind of failures I
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20120811 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20120811/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
This is the final merge from trunk before I start sending the
branch->trunk merge patches.
This merge required some non-mechanical fixes. A recent patch
introduced DEF_VEC_A() for vectors of atomic types. When a VEC
of an atomic type needs to be GC/PCH marked, the marker
needs to do nothing.
In
If You've Already Making 3000% and more On THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK, Stop
Reading. And If you don't need to Fast returns on Monday, DEFINITELY Go
Away!
V N DB is hitting a 3,000% gains in volume today, indicating some mighty
shorting, resulting in the price to be under the where it should be
