Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7

2012-06-16 Thread Chris Jefferson
On 15/06/12 21:45, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:12 PM, James Y Knight wrote: IMO, at the /very least/, libstdc++ should go ahead and change std::string to be the new implementation. Once std::string is ABI-incompatible between the modes, there's basically no chance that an

a fork of gcc is sold for $26k?

2012-06-16 Thread Arch hvv
Hello, Just found morpher dot com - it's based on GCC: Morpher is a compiler driven obfuscation solution for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++. Being a compiler, our tool has much more structural information than any other tool that works directly with binary format. Therefore the abilities of Morpher's C++ sour

Re: a fork of gcc is sold for $26k?

2012-06-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 16 June 2012 12:01, Arch hvv wrote: > Have anybody inspected it? Is GPL violated in this case or not (e.g. > do they provide all patches they've made to gcc)? If it's based on llvm-gcc then it only uses GCC as the front-end so there may be no reason to patch GCC.

Re: a fork of gcc is sold for $26k?

2012-06-16 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 16 June 2012 12:01, Arch hvv wrote: > > Have anybody inspected it? Is GPL violated in this case or not (e.g. > > do they provide all patches they've made to gcc)? > > If it's based on llvm-gcc then it only uses GCC as the front-end so > there

Re: a fork of gcc is sold for $26k?

2012-06-16 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Arch hvv writes: > Have anybody inspected it? Is GPL violated in this case or not (e.g. > do they provide all patches they've made to gcc)? If they provide the source code to anybody who purchases their package, then they are doing nothing wrong according to the GPL. I don't know whether they d

Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7

2012-06-16 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:12 PM, James Y Knight wrote: > > > IMO, at the /very least/, libstdc++ should go ahead and change std::string > > to be the new implementation. Once std::string is ABI-incompatible between > > the modes, there's basica

gcc-4.7-20120616 is now available

2012-06-16 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20120616 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20120616/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7

2012-06-16 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
I have no plan for willful obstruction in solving this recurring and really annoying problem that trips up users again and again, under all kinds of reasons (both perceived or constructed.)