Arch hvv <arch....@gmail.com> writes: > Have anybody inspected it? Is GPL violated in this case or not (e.g. > do they provide all patches they've made to gcc)?
If they provide the source code to anybody who purchases their package, then they are doing nothing wrong according to the GPL. I don't know whether they do or not, but in the absence of evidence I see no reason to assume they do not. In particular, there is no requirement that they make their source code available to the public at large. That said, discussions of GPL compliance are off-topic for this mailing list. If you want to pursue this, please write to licence-violat...@gnu.org, as described at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html . Thanks. Ian
