Query about DWARF output for recursively nested inlined subroutines

2012-03-02 Thread Dan Towner
Hi all, I have noticed the following construct appearing in some DWARF output and I'm don't understand what it means, or whether it is actually a bug: .uleb128 0x1c ;# (DIE (0x80a) DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine) .long 0x635;# DW_AT_abstract_origin .word _picoMark_LBB

GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-03-02)

2012-03-02 Thread Richard Guenther
The GCC 4.7 branch has been created and a first release candidate is being prepared right now. The branch is closed for now. Previous Report === http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-02/msg00441.html The next report will announce the release candidate.

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-03-02)

2012-03-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 03/02/2012 12:15 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: The GCC 4.7 branch has been created and a first release candidate is being prepared right now. The branch is closed for now. Just be clear (I think the information could be useful in general): mainline can be already considered open for Stage 1 co

GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-03-02), Stage 1 starts now

2012-03-02 Thread Richard Guenther
Status == The trunk has branched for the GCC 4.7 release and is now open again for general development, stage 1. Please consider not disrupting it too much during the RC phase of GCC 4.7 so it is possible to test important fixes for 4.7.0 on it. Quality Data Priority

gcc-4.8-20120302 is now available

2012-03-02 Thread Richard Guenther
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20120302 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20120302/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

GCC 4.7.0

2012-03-02 Thread Mioljub Ivanovic
GCC 4.7.0 listed, but there isn't link for download!

GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2012-03-02 Thread Richard Guenther
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 184777. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release

Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello All, I'm quite tempted to start working on a rewrite of gengtype in C++ (using C++03 standard). One of the reasons is that gengtype is really in bad shape, and nobody understands it well. Another reason is that gengtype needs to be enhanced to accept at least common C++ containers (like std

Re: GCC 4.7.0

2012-03-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:35:52PM +0100, Mioljub Ivanovic wrote: > GCC 4.7.0 listed, but there isn't link for download! 4.7.0 hasn't been released yet, just a release candidate - 4.7.0-rc1. The actual release will happen in a few weeks. If you want to try the release candidate, the link for it ha

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2012-03-02 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org > > The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302 > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 184777. > >

[Ann] GCC MELT plugin 0.9.4 for GCC 4.6 & 4.7

2012-03-02 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello All It is my pleasure to announce the GCC MELT plugin version 0.9.4 for GCC 4.6 & 4.7. MELT is a high level domain specific language to extend GCC. See http://gcc-melt.org/ for more The MELT plugin 0.9.4 for GCC 4.6 and 4.7 is available as a gzipped source tar archive from http://gcc-mel

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Laurynas Biveinis
Basile - > I'm quite tempted to start working on a rewrite of gengtype in C++ (using > C++03 standard). > > One of the reasons is that gengtype is really in bad shape, and nobody > understands it well. Another reason is that gengtype needs to be enhanced to > accept at least common C++ containers

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Diego Novillo
On 02/03/12 12:56 , Laurynas Biveinis wrote: Since no other GCC part is using C++ currently, I believe this would be rather poor first module choice to convert to C++. If C++ was already a non-optional requirement, then C++ conversion would be OK, It already is. We bootstrap in C++ mode. I d

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Laurynas Biveinis
2012/3/2 Diego Novillo : > It already is.  We bootstrap in C++ mode.  I don't see a problem starting to > move some code to C++.  Whether this is a good chunk of code to convert is > another question. Sorry, I should have been more precise and said "not the best first module choice to convert to C

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Diego Novillo
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 13:45, Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > 2012/3/2 Diego Novillo : >> It already is.  We bootstrap in C++ mode.  I don't see a problem starting to >> move some code to C++.  Whether this is a good chunk of code to convert is >> another question. > > Sorry, I should have been more pr

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:56:19 +0200 Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > Basile - > > > I'm quite tempted to start working on a rewrite of gengtype in C++ (using > > C++03 standard). > > > > One of the reasons is that gengtype is really in bad shape, and nobody > > understands it well. Another reason is tha

Re: Query about DWARF output for recursively nested inlined subroutines

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Eager
On 03/02/2012 02:49 AM, Dan Towner wrote: Hi all, I have noticed the following construct appearing in some DWARF output and I'm don't understand what it means, or whether it is actually a bug: .uleb128 0x1c ;# (DIE (0x80a) DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine) .long 0x635;# DW_

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Laurynas Biveinis
>> I agree that such conversion will have to be done at some point, but >> I'm not sure if a big rewrite should happen way before the rest of the >> code will start to use gengtype-annotated C++ data structures. > > Wait, I don't follow.  gengtype supporting C++ data structures is > different than

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:06:59PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote: > On 02/03/12 12:56 , Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > > >Since no other GCC part is using C++ currently, I believe this would > >be rather poor first module choice to convert to C++. If C++ was > >already a non-optional requirement, then C+

Re: Partly rewriting gengtype in C++ ?

2012-03-02 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:56:24 -0500 Diego Novillo wrote: > > > I agree that such conversion will have to be done at some point, but > > I'm not sure if a big rewrite should happen way before the rest of the > > code will start to use gengtype-annotated C++ data structures. > > Wait, I don't follow

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2012-03-02 Thread Rainer Orth
Dennis Clarke writes: >> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org >> >> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from >> >> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302 >> >> and shortly its mirrors. It has been g

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2012-03-02 Thread Dennis Clarke
>>> If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.7.0 in about three weeks. >> >> I'll drop it on Solaris. Give it a push. Do we realy really need that >> ppl/cloog stuff? I have never seen it build and pass any tests, ever, >> even once, on Solaris with or without Sun Studio compilers or GCC or >> praye

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2012-03-02 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Dennis Clarke writes: > >>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org >>> >>> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from >>> >>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302 >>> >>> and

Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread

2012-03-02 Thread Erotavlas_turbo
Hi, I have found the solution i.e. the developers of GCC have found it. The latest version of GCC 4.6.3 can be used with Helgrind. See here for more detail http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/debug.html#debug.races Best Regards Salvatore

gcc-4.6-20120302 is now available

2012-03-02 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120302 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120302/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report)

2012-03-02 Thread Jay Freeman (saurik)
> > "Jay Freeman (saurik)" writes: > "Ian Lance Taylor" wrote: > > After getting more sleep, I realize that this problem is actually much > > more endemic than I had even previously thought. Most any vaguely > > object-oriented library is going to have tons of function pointers in > > it, and yo