This mailing list is for development of gcc, not help using it.
Please direct questions about using or building gcc to the gcc-help
list, thanks.
On 10 January 2012 00:54, John Harper wrote:
> My little test program then compiled but wouldn't run even though the
> library said to be missing does
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:33:54PM -0500, Aayush Upadhyay wrote:
> I'm a sophomore in college, and I'm a solid C programmer. I'd like to work
> on an open source project, and the gcc compiler seems like a great one.
In addition to the other replies, you could also contribute to branches or
to GCC
Hello All
I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
Much more details are given in
http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
and in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2012-01/msg00017.html
So (unless you ask) I won't repeat them here.
(and the bugs affec
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
>
> Much more details are given in
>http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
> and in
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2012-01/msg00017.html
>
> So (unless you ask) I won't repeat t
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:12:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>
> > I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
> >
> > Much more details are given in
> >http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
> > and in
> >http://lists.gnu.org/arc
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:12:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>>
>> > I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
>> >
>> > Much more details are given in
>> >http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
>> >
On 01/07/2012 12:24 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
Hi Vlad,
While debugging a slightly modified version of the test case in PR16458:
int
foo (unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
{
if (a == b) return 1;
if (a> b) return 2;
if (a< b) return 3;
if (a != b) return 4;
ret
On 01/09/12 04:20, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Looking at Patrick's old list, the following bugs are still open
[trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in nested txns is missing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581
Aldy, you wanted to take a look. Were you able to repr
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:20 -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > Do we really need or want to create shuffle copies for insns that do not
> > have a two operand constraint?
> Yes, I think so. As I remember I did some benchmarking and it gave some
> "order" in hard register assignments and improved
gcc-python-plugin is a plugin for GCC 4.6 onwards which embeds the
CPython interpreter within GCC, allowing you to write new compiler
warnings in Python, generate code visualizations, etc.
It ships with "gcc-with-cpychecker", which implements static analysis
passes for GCC aimed at finding bugs in
On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
was
On 01/11/2012 09:29 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> + /* ??? mark only the first call, is it right? */
> + for (insn = get_last_insn ();
> +insn && !CALL_P (insn);
> insn = next_real_insn (insn))
> continue;
FYI, there shall only be one call, surely.
Hmm. I suppose
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20120110 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20120110/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 01/10/2012 05:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Also outstanding is that the return value setup for beginTransaction
needs to be adjusted into the new block. I.e. we current generate
(set (reg eax) (call _ITM_beginTransaction))
(set (reg psuedo) (reg eax))
.Lrestart:
// rest of tm
The Go language is closing in what we are calling Go version 1. This
will be a long-term stable release of Go, with no language or library
API changes. Go 1 is described here:
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/pub?id=1ny8uI-_BHrDCZv_zNBSthNKAMX_fR_0dc6epA6lztRE
The expected completi
15 matches
Mail list logo
