> DJ, can you amend your scripts so that the head of gcc/ChangeLog and
> src/ChangeLog is included? This will make it easier to bug relevant
> people.
Done.
Hi all,
I'm trying to bootstrap trunk on i686-pc-mingw32. I configure with
--disable-werror --enable-threads --disable-nls --build=i686-pc-mingw32
--enable-libgomp --with-dwarf2 --disable-sjlj-exceptions
During stage 1, bootstrap fails when comparing trunk tm.texi and the version
regenerated f
2010/10/3 FX :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to bootstrap trunk on i686-pc-mingw32. I configure with
> --disable-werror --enable-threads --disable-nls --build=i686-pc-mingw32
> --enable-libgomp --with-dwarf2 --disable-sjlj-exceptions
>
> During stage 1, bootstrap fails when comparing trunk tm.texi and
> This is a known issue and related to timestamps of those generated
> .texi files. By touching generated .texi it can be solved. This test
> in make is here a bit broken IMHO, as a content check would satisfy
> needs for validity-check alone.
I'm wondering about this part of the Makefile:
> This is a known issue and related to timestamps of those generated
> .texi files. By touching generated .texi it can be solved. This test
> in make is here a bit broken IMHO, as a content check would satisfy
> needs for validity-check alone.
Actually, it doesn't solve it. If "cpmd -s" returns fa
Hi all,
I can't find any mention of it at the usual place for external sources
(http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#upstream), so is our version
forked, or is that just an oversight?
cheers,
DaveK
[ adding bug-gnulib ]
Hi Dave,
* Dave Korn wrote on Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:42:15PM CEST:
> I can't find any mention of it at the usual place for external sources
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#upstream), so is our version
> forked, or is that just an oversight?
It comes original
On 03/10/2010 12:24, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ adding bug-gnulib ]
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> * Dave Korn wrote on Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:42:15PM CEST:
>> I can't find any mention of it at the usual place for external sources
>> (http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#upstream), so is our version
>>
The GNU Compiler Collection version 4.4.5 has been released.
GCC 4.4.5 is a bug-fix release containing fixes for regressions and
serious bugs in GCC 4.4.4. This release is available from the
FTP servers listed at:
http://www.gnu.org/order/ftp.html
Please do not contact me directly regarding q
Recently, I ran into a couple of bugs/regessions that show up
only if checking is enabled. This led me to the observation that
it might be useful if checking can be enabled at runtime via a
gcc command line switch. If this capability can be enabled by
default, then regression tests could depend u
Gary Funck writes:
> Recently, I ran into a couple of bugs/regessions that show up
> only if checking is enabled. This led me to the observation that
> it might be useful if checking can be enabled at runtime via a
> gcc command line switch. If this capability can be enabled by
> default, then
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20101003 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20101003/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:05 AM, FX wrote:
>> This is a known issue and related to timestamps of those generated
>> .texi files. By touching generated .texi it can be solved. This test
>> in make is here a bit broken IMHO, as a content check would satisfy
>> needs for validity-check alone.
>
> Actu
13 matches
Mail list logo
