Thanks. I am working for it now.
But I have a question about how to debug the cc1 with libgcc1.c.
because if I run the cc1 to build the libgcc2.c, lots of errors
occurred.
Run the cc1 with the command:
./cc1 -g -I../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/gcc
-I../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/gcc/../include
../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/g
I'm trying to formulate a bug report for tools used to examine/
process debug output.
looking specifically at the _debug_frame.
for this source:
---
int testfunc(void)
{
int i;
i = 1;
return i;
}
===
using -save-temps -dA -g -O0 -fverbose-asm (-gstrict-dwarf, on 4.5)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/24/2009 08:24 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> We already have the hooks, they have just been stuck in plugin.c when
>> they should really be in the generic backend. See register_pass.
>>
>> (Sigh, every time I looked at this I said "
Another problem I found when hacking other port.
Do I need to write SF, DF move operations?
And basic arithmetic insn patterns like ADD, SUB in DImode?
Because in CRX port (as I knew, there is no float point unit in this
cpu), DI,SF,DF mode have 'move' operation. and there are subtract,
add opera
With revision 152076 on i686-apple-darwin9 bootstrapped as described
in comment#61 of pr41405, I get:
[ibook-dhum] bug/debug% gcc45 -c -save-temps -dA -g -O0 -fverbose-asm
-gno-strict-dwarf simplistic.c
[ibook-dhum] bug/debug% dwarfdump --debug-frame simplistic.o
-
Present: Jakub Jelinek, Jan Hubicka, Martin Jambor, Michael Matz,
Paolo Bonzini, Petr Baudis, Richard Guenther
Not present but invited: Andreas Schwab, Zdenek Dvorak
The objective of this meeting was to have a discussion about the
development of GCC (and dependent tools and libraries) in
While looking at PR38747 again I was diving into the alias.c code
and tried to confirm that it does what I think it does for
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR. And in fact it basically does.
In general there are odds between what get_alias_set does if you
pass it a reference tree compared to what it does if yo
Hello all,
I am porting a 32bit target in GCC 4.4.0
The target has have distinct signed and unsigned compare instructions,
and only one set of conditional branch instructions. Moreover the
operands cannot be immediate values if the comparison is unsigned. I
have implemented this using compare-and-
On 24 Sep 2009, at 10:27, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
With revision 152076 on i686-apple-darwin9 bootstrapped as described
in comment#61 of pr41405, I get:
[ibook-dhum] bug/debug% gcc45 -c -save-temps -dA -g -O0 -fverbose-
asm -gno-strict-dwarf simplistic.c
[ibook-dhum] bug/debug% dwarfdump --
On 09/24/2009 02:41 PM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
How can i overcome this error?
Remove the guilty alternatives, for example the d/L alternative, and
make operand 2 a register_operand.
Paolo
On 09/20/2009 08:07 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
BTW, why don't we call this more-flexible-stage-3 "stage 2" any more? It
sounds a lot like the way that's still described on develop.html.
Because "New functionality may not be introdu
On 09/22/2009 10:16 PM, Kenny Simpson wrote:
Will the lambda branch be merged into 4.5?
Yes.
Jason
daniel tian wrote:
> Thanks. I am working for it now.
> But I have a question about how to debug the cc1 with libgcc1.c.
> because if I run the cc1 to build the libgcc2.c, lots of errors
> occurred.
>
> Run the cc1 with the command:
> ./cc1 -g -I../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/gcc
> -I../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/gc
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/20/2009 08:07 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
> > Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> > > >BTW, why don't we call this more-flexible-stage-3 "stage 2" any more?
> > > > It
> > > > sounds a lot like the way that's sti
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 03:01:12PM +0100, IainS wrote:
>
> So, this particular bug appears to be cleared at
>
> dwarfutils-66 or greater. (confir...@dwarfutils-70 as well)
>
> (It does not seem to affect powerpc-apple-darwin8 which only has
> dwarfutils-42,
> but I can't speak for i686-apple-d
daniel tian wrote:
> Another problem I found when hacking other port.
> Do I need to write SF, DF move operations?
> And basic arithmetic insn patterns like ADD, SUB in DImode?
>
> Because in CRX port (as I knew, there is no float point unit in this
> cpu), DI,SF,DF mode have 'move' operation. an
On 09/15/2009 12:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
The second major feature of Blocks vs c++ lambdas is that they can be
"copied onto the heap". This allows things like "Grand Central Dispatch"
to work: you can write code that executes blocks asynchronously or on
other threads/work queues (after the fu
On 24 Sep 2009, at 15:54, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 03:01:12PM +0100, IainS wrote:
So, this particular bug appears to be cleared at
Iain,
What do you mean by the 'bug appears to be cleared'? Can you
map which versions of Xcode on Intel darwin exhibit this bug
and which
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:03:28PM +0100, IainS wrote:
>
> this bug - "fail in dwarfdump --debug-frame" for i686 target
>
> Is present in:
> XCode 3.1.2 dwarfutils-49 (IIRC)
>
> In not present in:
> XCode 3.1.3 dwarfutils-66 and XCode 3.1.4 dwarfutils-70
>
> --
> N.B. this is NOT the "orig_str" Ab
On Sep 24, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/15/2009 12:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
The second major feature of Blocks vs c++ lambdas is that they can be
"copied onto the heap". This allows things like "Grand Central
Dispatch"
to work: you can write code that executes blocks asyn
On 09/24/09 04:35, Richard Guenther wrote:.
. It was also suggested to change hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
to ia64-hpux and to change s390-linux-gnu to s390x-linux-gnu in the
list of secondary targets.
No argument from me re: hppa moving to secondary status. IIRC, HP has
stopped selling new PA sy
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The regular problem of emitting warnings for unreachable code may
> be addressed by using a new variant of debug statements. Those
> would queue up warnings and if still around emit them during
> expansion. Currently queueing a warning can be done w
On 09/24/2009 05:41 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
(define_expand "cmp"
...
(define_expand "b"
For the record, you should be combining these into a cbranch expander,
so that you don't have to do the "save the cmp operands" trick anymore.
(define_insn_and_split "compare_and_branch_insn"
[(set
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> We discussed about features we don't like (PCH and -combine). PCH
> is used but has the issue that improper use is not diagnosed and PCH
> seems to be unmaintained. We agreed on deprecating -combine for 4.5
> though.
Can we map -combine to use LTO
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 09/24/2009 08:24 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>> We already have the hooks, they have just been stuck in plugin.c when
>>> they should really be in the generic backend. See
On 09/24/2009 12:35 AM, IainS wrote:
The main difference (and the area causing the tool to barf) is that the
FDE on 4.5 has some extra information not present in 4.4
.byte 0x4 # DW_CFA_advance_loc4
.set L$set$6,LCFI3-LCFI1
.long L$set$6
.byte 0xc5 # DW_CFA_restore, column 0x5
.byte 0xc # DW_CFA_
On 09/24/2009 11:22 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
Can the lambda (containing X) be copied and put onto a queue? What is
its type?
As you said, the lambda has a unique anonymous type. If you want to put
multiple lambdas into a container, you can use std::function as the
element type.
Jason
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > We discussed about features we don't like (PCH and -combine). PCH
> > is used but has the issue that improper use is not diagnosed and PCH
> > seems to be unmaintained. We agreed on deprecating -com
I've merged lto into trunk and am currently preparing the final set of
patches to submit. Please do not commit anything to the branch.
Diego.
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20090924 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20090924/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
It is my pleasure to announce that the steering committee has
appointed Le-Chun Wu and Rafael Espindola plug-in reviewers.
Thanks for all your contributions so far, and keep up the good
work!
Please adjust the MAINTAINERS file accordingly, and Happy hacking!
Gerald
[Cc to the gcc mailing-list]
On 2009-09-25 02:18:55 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Also, as EXP_BITS is the full (biased) exponent size, it seems that
> the real.c comment is buggy (27 -> 26).
Looking at the history:
Index: real.h
Hi all,
Over on the cygwin-improvements branch(*) I've got a fairly nifty fully
POSIX-based port of Ada, but there's one FAIL on the gnat testsuite that I'm
trying to debug. It could be a bug in the port, or the testcase might have
stressed an underlying bug in Cygwin's pthread functions.
hallo gcc_team suche gcc zum downloaden
wer kann mir helfen ?
liebe grüße u. danke im vorraus _gerhard_ gangl, reichsstr. 77, 8045 graz
34 matches
Mail list logo
