On 09/20/2009 08:07 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
BTW, why don't we call this more-flexible-stage-3 "stage 2" any more? It
sounds a lot like the way that's still described on develop.html.
Because "New functionality may not be introduced during this period." is
still true for this stage 3 and "support for a new language construct
might be added in a front-end" is also not wanted.
Ah, thanks. I missed the discussion when stage 2 fell out of use
As did I. I've been figuring that a couple of C++0x bits (lambdas,
delegating constructors) could go in during stage 2; but if there's no
stage 2 I guess I'll go ahead and merge the lambda branch during stage 1
rather than try to nail down all the corner cases first.
Jason
