hey,
i would like to know the latest stable version of gcc...
i have went through the website..
waiting for the reply,
vivek
2009/8/7 Mr. Vivek Varghese Jacob:
>
> i would like to know the latest stable version of gcc...
> i have went through the website..
Did you miss the front page? And the releases page?
If you still can't find the information* please send your question to
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org instead.
Jonathan
*
Mr. Vivek Varghese Jacob wrote:
> hey,
>
> i would like to know the latest stable version of gcc...
> i have went through the website..
>
> waiting for the reply,
>
> vivek
There are two stable release branches maintained at any time, one current and
one previous, and the most recent versions
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> Possibly we could modify the algorithm that enumerates directories matching
> "$tool.*" to look for (e.g.) "*$tool.*" and then name directories like
> "c.c++.dg"?
The algorithm is hardcoded in core DejaGnu (runtest.exp).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codeso
Hi,
We've a problem here. we were trying to use cc1 with & without -O
option to verify the optimizations happening in our sample code. these r the
list of outputs after each compilation
without -O
p...@shiva:~/Desktop/Compilers/GCC/build/test$ ls
1.c1.c.011t.ehopt1.c.0
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:50 PM, pms wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We've a problem here. we were trying to use cc1 with & without -O
> option to verify the optimizations happening in our sample code. these r the
> list of outputs after each compilation
> without -O
> p...@shiva:~/Desktop/Compilers/GCC/build/
Hi,
I am working on a new port.
The target machine supports post-increment and pre-decrement
addressing modes. These modes are twice faster than indexed mode.
It is important for us that GCC consider them well.
I wrote emails to gcc-help and I was told that GCC was not so good at
pre/post-dec/in
Hi -
Nicolas wrote:
> Anyone has an idea of the git version running on gcc.gnu.org? It is
> certainly buggy and needs fixing.
It was 1.6.3.2 now it's 1.6.4, practically spring chickens.
> Anyway... To solve your problem, you simply need to run 'git gc' with
> the --prune=now [...]
> And BTW,
thanks, But b=a is a assignment statement. It is doing some memory operations
isn't it. Assuming b=a is a dead statement, how r the following i386
assembly statements generated
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
andl$-16, %esp
subl$16, %esp
movl$5, 4(%esp)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Florent Defay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a new port.
>
> The target machine supports post-increment and pre-decrement
> addressing modes. These modes are twice faster than indexed mode.
> It is important for us that GCC consider them well.
GCC does support ge
I asked similar question regarding PRE_INC/POST_INC quite a while ago,
and there were quite some discussions. Haven't check whether the situation
changed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00032.html
Bingfeng Mei
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gc
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:38:01PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> I've been thinking about that lately, it would be useful for several
> kinds of functionality. We'd want effective targets for the language
> for using different options and for providing different error/warning
> checks for each lan
2009/8/7 Janis Johnson :
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 00:06 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> Often I want to test the exactly same testcase in C and C++, so I find
>> myself adding duplicate tests under gcc.dg/ and g++.dg/. Would it be
>> possible to have a shared testsuite dir that is run for both
Hi,
Let's have a look at std::pair<>::swap and std::lower_bound<> implementations.
1. pair::swap in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h?view=markup
void
swap(pair& __p)
{
using std::swap;
swap(first, __p.first);
sw
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:48 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Janis, it would be extremely useful to have dg-options that are only
> enabled for certain languages, so I can do
>
> /* { dg-options "-std=c99" { dg-require-effective-target c } } */
> /* { dg-options "" { dg-require-effective-target
2009/8/7 Maxim Dementiev:
>
> It means that swap for user types could be defined either in std namespace
> or in the user type namespace (argument-dependent name lookup).
Yes, this is intentional. swap() is a point of customisation point,
see http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184401876 and the definition in
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:19:03 +0100
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
2009/8/7 Maxim Dementiev:
It means that swap for user types could be defined either in std namespace
or in the user type namespace (argument-dependent name lookup).
Yes, this is intentional. swap() is a point of customisation point,
s
On 08/06/2009 12:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
{ exc_ptr, filter } = EH_LANDING_PAD;
Placeholder for the landing-pad rtl. Has 2 outputs
for both the exception pointer and the filter.
I'm going to drop this construct. Instead, I'm going to mark
the label, and have the land
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/06/2009 12:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> { exc_ptr, filter } = EH_LANDING_PAD;
>>
>> Placeholder for the landing-pad rtl. Has 2 outputs
>> for both the exception pointer and the filter.
>
> I'm going to drop th
On 08/07/2009 12:31 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
L.N:
exc_ptr.1 = EXC_PTR_EXPR (N);
filter.1 = FILTER_EXPR (N);
Will exc_ptr.1 and filter.1 be gimple registers?
Yes.
Does the above have
virtual operands, thus are there any aliases to whatever EXP_PTR_EXPR
or FILTER_EXPR load?
No and no
20 matches
Mail list logo
