gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 25/05/2009 21:53:41:
> for a loop like
>
> 1 for(i=0;i 2 for(j=0;j 3 a[i][j] = a[i][j]+b[i][j];
>
> GCC 4.3.* is unable to get the information for the inner loop that
> array reference 'a' is alias of each other and generates code f
Hi all,
I've a main Gentoo 64bit system with CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" and
CFLAGS="-march=native -mtune=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer".
My cpu is a Pentium 4 Prescott and i'm using gcc-4.3.2.
With this little script:
"echo 'float x(float x){return x < 0 ? -x : x;}' > x.c && gcc
-fverbose
Hello again,
I 'm still working on egcs 1.1 and the function cp_namespace_decls is
not implemented in.
I just want to get the classes and functions implemented in my source
code and I tried to get them with the function gettags but I think I
didn't understand something. I tried to read some th
Hello again,
to answer your question my code's purpose is to write a kind of tree in
a file, the main arborescence is the classes, their method (with
parameters, return type, ...), their attributes, etc... it will also
recognize some new keywords I will introduce thanks to "__attribute__".
In
Luca Zorzo writes:
> I've a main Gentoo 64bit system with CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" and
> CFLAGS="-march=native -mtune=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer".
> My cpu is a Pentium 4 Prescott and i'm using gcc-4.3.2.
>
> With this little script:
> "echo 'float x(float x){return x < 0 ? -x : x;}
Nicolas COLLIN wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I 'm still working on egcs 1.1 and the function cp_namespace_decls is
> not implemented in.
Well, the definition is very simple
tree
cp_namespace_decls (tree ns)
{
return NAMESPACE_LEVEL (ns)->names;
}
and NAMESPACE_LEVEL exists in egcs-1.1, so why n
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20090526 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20090526/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Jamie Prescott wrote:
Is there a reason why something like this would not work?
if (!TARGET_XXX2)
emit_clobber(gen_rtx_REG(CCmode, CC_REGNUM));
emit_insn(gen_addsi3_nc(operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
Yes. The optimizer will not know that addsi3_nc uses CC_REGNUM, as it
If I run gcc -fverbose-asm -mtune=native -march=native -S x.c
I get
cat x.s:
.file "x.c"
# GNU C (GCC) version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4) (x86_64-redhat-linux)
# compiled by GNU C version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4), GMP
version 4.2.4, MPFR version 2.4.1.
# GGC heuristic
sean darcy writes:
> If I run gcc -fverbose-asm -mtune=native -march=native -S x.c
>
> I get
> cat x.s:
> .file "x.c"
> # GNU C (GCC) version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4) (x86_64-redhat-linux)
> # compiled by GNU C version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4), GMP
> version 4.2.4, MPF
10 matches
Mail list logo