Re: Backward Compatibility of RHEL Advanced Server and GCC

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:19 AM, S. Suhasini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We would like to know whether the new version of the software (compiled with > the new GCC) can be deployed and run on the older setup with RHEL AS 3 and > GCC 2.96. We need not compile again on the older setup. Will there be

Re: Continuous builder up

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/25 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I have placed a continuous builder (IE it does one build per svn >> change) for GCC for x86_64 on an 8 core machine (nicely provided by >> Google), and it has results

Your Payment sent to you,

How are you today? I write to inform you that we have already sent you USD6000.00 dollars through Western union as we have been given the mandate to transfer your full compensation payment total sum of USD800,000.00 via western union by this governemnt.I was calling your telephone number to g

Re: Continuous builder up

2008/10/29 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The patch tracker was an experiment in trying to see if it would > improve the rate of patches falling through the cracks. > It had the secondary effect of getting some other patches reviewed > quicker in some cases, because of those who paid attentio

Re: Backward Compatibility of RHEL Advanced Server and GCC

Steven Bosscher wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:19 AM, S. Suhasini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We would like to know whether the new version of the software (compiled with the new GCC) can be deployed and run on the older setup with RHEL AS 3 and GCC 2.96. We need not compile again on the old

Re: Continuous builder up

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/29 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> The patch tracker was an experiment in trying to see if it would >> improve the rate of patches falling through the cracks. >> It had the secondary effect of getting so

How to find out all the calling instance of a class member function?

Hi, Suppose I have a class B in namespace A, it has several overloaded member function doit. I'm wondering how to find all the lines where there is a statement that calls one particular overloaded doit member function? Is it possible to do so from g++ command line? Or I have to modify g++ to make

Re: Continuous builder up

"Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> A bi-weekly status report of the patch tracker sent to gcc-patches >> would definitively make the list of unreviewed patches more visible. I >> believe this may also be a problem for the continuous builder: If >> there is no visible feedback from it,

Register Allocation Question.

Hello Everyone, I have a question regarding the register allocation steps in GCC. I am creating an hypothetical example to make things easy. My processor has 2 set of register fiels with 1-16 in Class1 and 16-32 in class 2 Let's say I have an RTL X with destination register R1, But

Re: Continuous builder up

2008/10/29 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> I agree that the patch tracker probably does not get more patches >> reviewed but it definitely gets less patches lost. > > But in the end, it didn't solve the underlying problem, so it didn't > improve our rate of attrition of smaller contributor

r141295 and r141383 commits broke UTF-8 in gcc/ChangeLog

Hi! Nick/Vlad, could you please check your editors? Your recent r141295 and r141383 commits mangled many UTF-8 characters in gcc/ChangeLog. I've reverted those parts of your commits as r141428, just wouldn't like to do it too often. Thanks. Jakub

Re: Continuous builder up

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> A bi-weekly status report of the patch tracker sent to gcc-patches >>> would definitively make the list of unreviewed patches more visible. I >>> believe this may also b

RE: Continuous builder up

Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 29 October 2008 15:42: > "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> A bi-weekly status report of the patch tracker sent to gcc-patches >>> would definitively make the list of unreviewed patches more visible. I >>> believe this may also be a problem for the continu

Re: Continuous builder up

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Back at Cygnus I wrote a script which sent out a daily report for bugs > which had not been fixed, and I think it was very helpful. A daily > report is not appropriate here,

Re: Register Allocation Question.

> Let's say I have an RTL X with destination register R1, But if I > want to schedule this RTL to Class2. What can I do? I see that GCC > doesn't change the register number if it already holds a hard-register. Use constraints. They are described in md.texi.

gcc-4.2-20081029 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.2-20081029 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20081029/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Continuous builder up

"Andrew Pinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Back at Cygnus I wrote a script which sent out a daily report for bugs >> which had not been fixed, and I think it was very h

Re: Continuous builder up

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It needs to be a summary report, not one message per patch. Does > bugzilla have that capability? Yes, here is an example of the whine report (from yesterday): Click here to edit your whine schedule Assigned bugs ID