Hi all,
how is the must-alias information represented in mainline?
Is there something like DEF-USE chains for virtual operands?
How can I access this kind of information and where should I look for
some examples how to use it?
Thank you very much!
Regards,
Martin
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Xinliang David Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The patch is pretty big, so I am waiting for stage1 is reopened to submit.
Posting it when it's ready is a good idea usually to try to get
feedback and review
while you still remember every line of code. Of course,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Martin Schindewolf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> how is the must-alias information represented in mainline?
> Is there something like DEF-USE chains for virtual operands?
> How can I access this kind of information and where should I look for some
> exam
Hi!
I think we are now almost a month past the deadline for removal of -fno-ira
and ports that haven't been converted to IRA yet.
Vladimir, do you plan to move forward with this step any time soon?
The following ports haven't been converted yet:
arc m32c m68hc11 mmix pdp11 score vax
Jak
> The following ports haven't been converted yet:
>
> arc m32c m68hc11 mmix pdp11 score vax
DJ has reported problems on the list for m32c.
Regarding ARC and MMIX we might expect some action from Joern and H-P
respectively, but nobody is probably going to do the work for the others
Paolo
> > The following ports haven't been converted yet:
> >
> > arc m32c m68hc11 mmix pdp11 score vax
>
> DJ has reported problems on the list for m32c.
>
> Regarding ARC and MMIX we might expect some action from Joern and H-P
> respectively, but nobody is probably going to do the work for the other
> Regarding ARC and MMIX we might expect some action from Joern and H-P
> respectively, but nobody is probably going to do the work for the others
We've faxed the Copyright assignemnt to the FSF on the 3rd of September,
with the physical signed copy Fedexed on the 4th and received on the 5th
of Se
> The following ports haven't been converted yet:
>
> m32c
I've tried and tried to get IRA for m32c working. I asked Vlad and
Jeff to look at it, which they have/are, with no definite results yet.
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I think we are now almost a month past the deadline for removal of -fno-ira
and ports that haven't been converted to IRA yet.
Vladimir, do you plan to move forward with this step any time soon?
I'd rather wait for 2-3 weeks more. People are still working on some
ta
Hello,
Can i make use of functions defined in "tree-data-ref.h" for data
dependency analysis on GIMPLE trees ?
Thanks.
>arc m32c m68hc11 mmix pdp11 score vax
I'll try to get to pdp11 soon.
paul
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Joern Rennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Regarding ARC and MMIX we might expect some action from Joern and H-P
>> respectively, but nobody is probably going to do the work for the others
>
> We've faxed the Copyright assignemnt to the FSF on the 3rd of September
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think we are now almost a month past the deadline for removal of -fno-ira
> and ports that haven't been converted to IRA yet.
The plan was to add the ports to the deprecation list (so they can be
reenabled by a small patch defining IRA_COVER
Sure, that's why they are there.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:00 AM,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can i make use of functions defined in "tree-data-ref.h" for data dependency
> analysis on GIMPLE trees ?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
In scanasm.exp we do this:
proc scan-assembler { args } {
upvar 2 name testcase
set output_file "[file rootname [file tail $testcase]].s"
However, in dejagnu, $name may have compiler switches appended to it:
# We append the compilation flags, if any, to ensure that the test case
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 18:00 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> In scanasm.exp we do this:
>
> proc scan-assembler { args } {
> upvar 2 name testcase
> set output_file "[file rootname [file tail $testcase]].s"
>
>
> However, in dejagnu, $name may have compiler switches appended to it:
>
> #
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20081023 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20081023/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
> I thought something like that was already done but I couldn't find it
> right now. Is it a problem? If so, we should certainly do this.
I see it done in other places, but not scanasm. How's this?
2008-10-23 DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/scanasm.exp: Extract first word of $
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:12 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > I thought something like that was already done but I couldn't find it
> > right now. Is it a problem? If so, we should certainly do this.
>
> I see it done in other places, but not scanasm. How's this?
>
> 2008-10-23 DJ Delorie <[EMAIL
> OK, after you've run the testsuite with this change. The ChangeLog
> entry should show the names of all of the procs you changed.
Is gcc.target/i386.exp enough? I originally found it with
xstormy16-elf on an older branch, but xstormy16 isn't a happy target
in trunk at the moment.
20 matches
Mail list logo
