On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was speaking to Andrew Tridgell yesterday about how he uses svn with
> the Samba project. He mentioned an idea that we could pursue in the GCC
> project.
>
> As you know, Subversion keeps all branches and the trunk und
Hello all,
It is not necessary that a pattern with a single constrain will have
only one instruction in the template.
Say if the pattern A have two instructions in the template and pattern
B has one instruction in the template and the target has only two
delay slots will i be able to tell gcc that
Hi,
Since yesterday I'm having seemingly random bootstrap comparisons failures on
i586-suse-linux: for caller-save.o yesterday, for build/gensupport.o today at
revision 133861. But a second tree at the same revision bootstrapped fine.
Is anyone else seeing this?
--
Eric Botcazou
"Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is not necessary that a pattern with a single constrain will have
> only one instruction in the template.
> Say if the pattern A have two instructions in the template and pattern
> B has one instruction in the template and the target has only two
>
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It is not necessary that a pattern with a single constrain will have
> > only one instruction in the template.
> > Say if the pattern A have two instructions in the t
Hi,
Intel has published Intel AVX spec:
http://softwareprojects.intel.com/avx/
I am checking in AVX binutils support. We will create an avx branch
soon.
H.J.
Eric Botcazou wrote:
Hi,
Since yesterday I'm having seemingly random bootstrap comparisons failures on
i586-suse-linux: for caller-save.o yesterday, for build/gensupport.o today at
revision 133861. But a second tree at the same revision bootstrapped fine.
Is anyone else seeing this?
Have
Hi,
Intel published Intel AVX spec:
http://softwareprojects.intel.com/avx/
It extended SSE registers to 256bit. I checked in the AVX binutils
support:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-04/msg00045.html
For 32bit, I used numbers 53-60 for %ymm0-%ymm7. For 64bit, I used
numbers 70-85 for %y
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Say the target has two delay slots for call instructions.
> > So we can have something like this
> > (define_attr "slottable" "no,yes,has_slot" (const_string "yes"))
>
"Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Say the target has two delay slots for call instructions.
> So we can have something like this
> (define_attr "slottable" "no,yes,has_slot" (const_string "yes"))
>
> (define_delay (eq_attr "slottable" "has_slot")
> [(eq_attr "slottable" "yes") (nil)
Am 03.04.2008 um 16:22 schrieb Mohamed Shafi:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Now imagine that i have 3 patterns : Pattern A with two instructions
in its template, Pattern B and Pattern C with only one
"Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> > Say the target has two delay slots for call instructions.
>> > So we can have something like this
>> > (define_attr
This is the beta release of binutils 2.18.50.0.6 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2008 0403 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree.
You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:30 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 05:16:23PM -0700, Xiaoxiang Liu wrote:
> > I have a question regarding GCC4 version compatibility? In general,
> > should two versions with same major version number be compatible?
> > Specifically, I want to confirm wheth
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20080403 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20080403/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
The Embedded-C spec introduces a number of C language features useful
for embedded development. GCC already implements fixed point arithmetic
(Chapter 4) from this proposal.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1169.pdf
Chapter 5 is divided into two sections: named address space su
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our implementation only covers section 5.1 of the proposal (named
> address space support). Section 5.2 has not been implemented.
Is C++ supported? I do know for that fixed point types, C++ is mostly
supported (except ma
> Is C++ supported? I do know for that fixed point types, C++ is mostly
> supported (except mangling and a couple others). I think we should not
> be adding extension unless they are both supported in the C and C++
> front-ends.
C++ is not supported because this proposal came from WG14 (which is
18 matches
Mail list logo
