Define __NO_MATH_INLINES for x86 -ffast-math?

Hello! I have tripped over a problem, where #defines from libc (bits/mathinline.h) interfere badly with gcc's intrinsics. The problem (note the #include): --cut here-- #include double test (double x) { return ceil(x); } --cut here-- when compiled with -O2 -ffast-math -msse2 -mfpmath=sse, co

Re: Define __NO_MATH_INLINES for x86 -ffast-math?

On 9/17/07, Uros Bizjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > I have tripped over a problem, where #defines from libc > (bits/mathinline.h) interfere badly with gcc's intrinsics. > > The problem (note the #include): > > --cut here-- > #include > > double test (double x) > { > return ceil(x); >

Re: Define __NO_MATH_INLINES for x86 -ffast-math?

> On 9/17/07, Uros Bizjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I have tripped over a problem, where #defines from libc > > (bits/mathinline.h) interfere badly with gcc's intrinsics. > > > > The problem (note the #include): > > > > --cut here-- > > #include > > > > double test (double x) >

Online Job Representative Staff

Dear Employee, We needs a representative in United Kingdom to act as our Online Staff through which our customers can pay outstanding bills owed by them to us in your Region We are looking only for the Honest and Open – Hearted Individual whosatisfies our requirements and glad to offer this

Online Job Representative Staff

Dear Employee, We needs a representative in United Kingdom to act as our Online Staff through which our customers can pay outstanding bills owed by them to us in your Region We are looking only for the Honest and Open – Hearted Individual whosatisfies our requirements and glad to offer this

Ada rts fails to build on ppc64?

On trunk I get /usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/ -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/include -isystem

Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc?

rpc64-suse-linux-gnu > On trunk I get > > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc > > -B/usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/ > -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/lib/ -isystem

Re: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can > release GCC 4.3.0. ;-) > > In our current documentation we have both "command-line option" and > "command line option". Like other such cases, we should make a choice > and document

Re: Should -ftrapv check type conversion?

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Ken Raeburn wrote: > I see a few reports in Bugzilla, many marked as duplicates of PR 19020 though > they cover a few different cases, which have me wondering about what the scope > of -ftrapv ought to be. See my message

Online Job Representative Staff

Dear Employee, We needs a representative in United Kingdom to act as our Online Staff through which our customers can pay outstanding bills owed by them to us in your Region We are looking only for the Honest and Open – Hearted Individual whosatisfies our requirements and glad to offer this

Online Job Representative Staff

Dear Employee, We needs a representative in United Kingdom to act as our Online Staff through which our customers can pay outstanding bills owed by them to us in your Region We are looking only for the Honest and Open – Hearted Individual whosatisfies our requirements and glad to offer this

Re: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option

Joseph S. Myers wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can release GCC 4.3.0. ;-) In our current documentation we have both "command-line option" and "command line option". Like other such cases, we should make a choic

Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc?

> It's actually powerpc configured like > > ../configure --with-cpu=default32 --build=powerpc64-suse-linux > checking build system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu > checking host system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu > checking target system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu Looks like 2007-08-

Re: ICE on valid code, cse related

On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:02:06PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: >What happened to the experiments you described at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg01178.html>? Emitting a no-op move > of the (set (reg) (reg)) form won't work, but maybe something like > > (insn (use (reg) (expr

Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64?

Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On trunk I get > > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc > > -B/usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/ > -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/

bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

Bootstrap of powerpc64-linux fails building libgfortran with: /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c: In function 'set_integer': /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c:81: internal compiler error: in set_variable_part, at var-tracking.c:2381 Please submit a full

Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64?

On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 17:55 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On trunk I get > > > > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc > > > > -B/usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3

Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:50:17AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: > Bootstrap of powerpc64-linux fails building libgfortran with: > > /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c: In function > 'set_integer': > /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c:81: internal compiler

Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

On 9/17/07, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My guess is that this is a long standing latent bug with var-tracking > on big endian machines, we saw it a few times with gcc-4.1.x-RH as well. > The problem is that after optimizing some subregs we can have negative > offsets in MEM_OFFSET of

Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64?

Laurent GUERBY wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 17:55 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On trunk I get /usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/packages/BUILD/gcc-4.3.0-20070917/obj-powerpc6

Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64?

This is for Joel :). I know nothing about autoconf, near to nothing about Makefile and I don't even know what multilib are for (I never found any documentation about them :). Laurent On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:20 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Laurent, > I would suggest you start over using the

Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bootstrap of powerpc64-linux fails building libgfortran with: > > /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c: In function > 'set_integer': > /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c:81: internal compiler > error: in set_vari

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04)

Kai Tietz wrote: >> I'm sorry -- that doesn't really answer the question I was trying to >> ask. To be clear, if we're calling through a function pointer, we still >> need to be able to do the right thing, and in that case we don't have a >> FUNCTION_DECL. So, I don't understand how you can have

Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64?

Laurent, I would suggest you start over using the libgfortran as your example. Geoffrey Keating created the config/multi.m4 file which dramatically simplified how the multilib could be implemented. If I recall correctly from when I helped clean up some of the residual multilib problems (so they

Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:41 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Bootstrap of powerpc64-linux fails building libgfortran with: > > > > /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c: In function > > 'set_integer': > > /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsv

gcc-4.1-20070917 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.1-20070917 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20070917/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:41 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Bootstrap of powerpc64-linux fails building libgfortran with: >> > >> > /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c: In function >>

Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

Richard Sandiford wrote: > Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:41 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> >>> Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> Bootstrap of powerpc64-linux fails building libgfortran with: /home/janis/gcc_tru

Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part

Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:41 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >>> >>> Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bootstrap of powerpc6