On 9/17/07, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My guess is that this is a long standing latent bug with var-tracking > on big endian machines, we saw it a few times with gcc-4.1.x-RH as well. > The problem is that after optimizing some subregs we can have negative > offsets in MEM_OFFSET of some REG vars (e.g. when a QImode user decl > is held in the least significant bits of SImode or DImode register) > and var-tracking is very upset about that. Haven't had time to > try to fix this though.
I thought we fixed that issue with: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29558 Thanks, Andrew Pinski
