Thanks for the hints, I have already noticed that insn list is match
against the RTL templates to emit assembly code. However, I found 3 md
files, ia64.md, itanium.md, itanium2.md, each file is very big...
would you mind giving some hints on the differences between them?
Especially, I am wor
Joe Buck wrote:
The result is that GCC explicitly rejects something that you might have
been taught in compiler class, that the standard is a contract between
the compiler developer and the users and that the compiler can do anything
it wants with any code that does not rigorously meet what is d
Just care ia64.md.
itanium1.md is for the description of itanium1 processor's pipeline,
and itanium2.md for the description of itanium2 processor's pipeline.
The are both used in the instruction scheduling pass.
On 2/4/07, 吴曦 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the hints, I have already notic
I'm seeing this bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu (revision 121579) -
something I'm doing wrong, or is anyone else seeing this?
/home/dorit/mainline/build/./gcc/gfortran
-B/home/dorit/mainline/build/./gcc/
-B/home/dorit/mainline/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/home/dorit/mainline/i686-pc-linux-gnu
Hello world,
just a heads-up that libgfortran build is currently blocked at
least on i686-pc-linux-gnu with a newer glibc by PR 30678.
I won't be able to do any work on gfortran development until this
is fixed :-(
Thomas
Hi,
I'd like to write a small language. This would be my first language
and I'm faced with several implementation options. I have a hard time
raking them so I'd like to ask advice from the GCC users and
developers.
The language will feature dynamic typing, lexical closures and garbage
collec
> My options code generations are more or less:
>
> 1) Code an interpreter
>
> 2) Build the parse tree in GCC's native format and let GCC generate
> the code
>
> 3) Generate annotated C and call GCC on that.
3b) Generate ISO C. Compile with $(CC).
4) Convert your internal (parse) trees
I guess I could have worded my email a bit better. Of course I don't
assume that the GCC developers are ignoring standards. Nor do I think
any of us are unaware of GCC's ability to support a standard and have
extensions to it that go beyond the standard. So I simply want to
suggest to the prope
icrashedtheinternet wrote:
I guess I could have worded my email a bit better. Of course I don't
assume that the GCC developers are ignoring standards. Nor do I think
any of us are unaware of GCC's ability to support a standard and have
extensions to it that go beyond the standard. So I simply
[Danny, Richard G., please see below.]
Thanks to all who have helped tested GCC 4.1.2 RC1 over the last week.
I've reviewed the list traffic and Bugzilla. Sadly, there are a fair
number of bugs. Fortunately, most seem not to be new in 4.1.2, and
therefore I don't consider them showstoppers.
Th
Dorit Nuzman wrote:
I'm seeing this bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu (revision 121579) -
something I'm doing wrong, or is anyone else seeing this?
Yes. I see the same at x86_64-redhat-linux.
- Grigory
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> I'd be curious to know the effect of removing the "complexity" field of
>> struct tree_exp.
> Doesn't work:
>
> trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c: In function 'tsubst_expr':
> trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:8924: error: 'struct tree_exp' has no member named
> 'complexity'
Th
12 matches
Mail list logo