Re: Some hints on solving this problem?

2007-02-04 Thread 吴曦
Thanks for the hints, I have already noticed that insn list is match against the RTL templates to emit assembly code. However, I found 3 md files, ia64.md, itanium.md, itanium2.md, each file is very big... would you mind giving some hints on the differences between them? Especially, I am wor

Re: The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!?

2007-02-04 Thread Robert Dewar
Joe Buck wrote: The result is that GCC explicitly rejects something that you might have been taught in compiler class, that the standard is a contract between the compiler developer and the users and that the compiler can do anything it wants with any code that does not rigorously meet what is d

Re: Some hints on solving this problem?

2007-02-04 Thread Paul Yuan
Just care ia64.md. itanium1.md is for the description of itanium1 processor's pipeline, and itanium2.md for the description of itanium2 processor's pipeline. The are both used in the instruction scheduling pass. On 2/4/07, 吴曦 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the hints, I have already notic

build failure? (libgfortran)

2007-02-04 Thread Dorit Nuzman
I'm seeing this bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu (revision 121579) - something I'm doing wrong, or is anyone else seeing this? /home/dorit/mainline/build/./gcc/gfortran -B/home/dorit/mainline/build/./gcc/ -B/home/dorit/mainline/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/dorit/mainline/i686-pc-linux-gnu

Build failure in libgfortran (PR 30678)

2007-02-04 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, just a heads-up that libgfortran build is currently blocked at least on i686-pc-linux-gnu with a newer glibc by PR 30678. I won't be able to do any work on gfortran development until this is fixed :-( Thomas

Seeking advice on front ends

2007-02-04 Thread Yannick Gingras
Hi, I'd like to write a small language. This would be my first language and I'm faced with several implementation options. I have a hard time raking them so I'd like to ask advice from the GCC users and developers. The language will feature dynamic typing, lexical closures and garbage collec

Re: Seeking advice on front ends

2007-02-04 Thread Paul Brook
> My options code generations are more or less: > > 1) Code an interpreter > > 2) Build the parse tree in GCC's native format and let GCC generate > the code > > 3) Generate annotated C and call GCC on that. 3b) Generate ISO C. Compile with $(CC). 4) Convert your internal (parse) trees

The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!?

2007-02-04 Thread icrashedtheinternet
I guess I could have worded my email a bit better. Of course I don't assume that the GCC developers are ignoring standards. Nor do I think any of us are unaware of GCC's ability to support a standard and have extensions to it that go beyond the standard. So I simply want to suggest to the prope

Re: The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!?

2007-02-04 Thread Brooks Moses
icrashedtheinternet wrote: I guess I could have worded my email a bit better. Of course I don't assume that the GCC developers are ignoring standards. Nor do I think any of us are unaware of GCC's ability to support a standard and have extensions to it that go beyond the standard. So I simply

GCC 4.1.2 Status Report

2007-02-04 Thread Mark Mitchell
[Danny, Richard G., please see below.] Thanks to all who have helped tested GCC 4.1.2 RC1 over the last week. I've reviewed the list traffic and Bugzilla. Sadly, there are a fair number of bugs. Fortunately, most seem not to be new in 4.1.2, and therefore I don't consider them showstoppers. Th

Re: build failure? (libgfortran)

2007-02-04 Thread Grigory Zagorodnev
Dorit Nuzman wrote: I'm seeing this bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu (revision 121579) - something I'm doing wrong, or is anyone else seeing this? Yes. I see the same at x86_64-redhat-linux. - Grigory

Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine

2007-02-04 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> I'd be curious to know the effect of removing the "complexity" field of >> struct tree_exp. > Doesn't work: > > trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c: In function 'tsubst_expr': > trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:8924: error: 'struct tree_exp' has no member named > 'complexity' Th