[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I guess everybody is very busy. However, it would be nice to set up a
> page in the GCC Wiki with the list of projects accepted for this year
> SoC and some links. If someone has this information, I would volunteer
> to "wikify" it.
I've been assuming that Google was g
Could you write us what command we should use?
We'd like to emphasize that we don't want to recompile whole gcc on our
computer, we just want to make use of changes we did in the repository.
Short answer is you can't. The gcc build system doesn't support building just
the target libraries. Yo
Google approved six applications for gcc for Summer of Code 2006.
They are:
Code parallelization using polyhdral model Plesco Alexandru
Escape analysisPaul Biggar
Garbage collection tuning Laurynas Biveinis
java.lang.management in Classpath
Hi
thanks a lot for your reply.
I'm not sure if you understood what I meant...
I'm a student of the Faculty of Mathematics & Computer Science at the
Warsaw University of Technology. I'm in my final year of my studies
(MSc) and I'm working on my final project.
The the subject of my project is: "E
On 5/25/06, Marek Zuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
thanks a lot for your reply.
I'm not sure if you understood what I meant...
I'm a student of the Faculty of Mathematics & Computer Science at the
Warsaw University of Technology. I'm in my final year of my studies
(MSc) and I'm working on my f
"Paul Biggar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Google approved six applications for gcc for Summer of Code 2006.
> > They are:
> >
> > Code parallelization using polyhdral model Plesco Alexandru
> > Escape analysisPaul Biggar
> > Garbage collection tuning
On May 23, 2006, at 11:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
A new calling convention could push two return addresses for functions
that return their status in EAX. On EAX=0 you take the first return,
EAX != 0 you take the second.
This seems the same as passing an extra function pointer
argument and calling t
Hello,
does anybody know why a cross-gnatmake needs
a "gcc" (host version, no target prefix) in
order to cross-build a static library?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi,
I'd like to gather some opinions and advice on the expansion of
__builtin_frame_address, as discussed on gcc-patches last year [1, 2].
This centres on the following comment in expand_builtin_return_addr
arising from revision 103294 last year:
/* For a zero count, we don't care what frame add
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Paul Biggar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Google approved six applications for gcc for Summer of Code 2006.
>>> They are:
>>>
>>> Code parallelization using polyhdral model Plesco Alexandru
>>> Escape analysisPaul Biggar
>>> Garba
Daniel, I think it is not a problem that this info appears also in the
GCC wiki, is it?
Thus, tonight, I will write it down in the GCC wiki for further
reference. If someone wishes to send me further information (links to
blogs or webpages), you are welcome to send it to my email address.
My inte
On 5/25/06, Geert Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 11:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
> A new calling convention could push two return addresses for functions
> that return their status in EAX. On EAX=0 you take the first return,
> EAX != 0 you take the second.
This seems the same as
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 07:28 -0700, Bernd Trog wrote:
> Hello,
> does anybody know why a cross-gnatmake needs
> a "gcc" (host version, no target prefix) in
> order to cross-build a static library?
Hard to say without more information, looks like a bug though, I suggest
you post detailed commands
--- Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hard to say without more information, looks like a bug though, I suggest
> you post detailed commands and logs in gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla :)
OK. It's PR27769. (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27769)
On 5/25/06, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ran into another snag that taking the alternative return on a P4 has
really bad performance impacts since it messes up prefetch. This
sequence is the killer.
addl$4, %esp
ret /* Return to err
In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-05/msg00604.html, you wrote:
The sequence of call, test, jne (or slight variations) occurs in
1000's of places, if a better alternative can be found there could be
significant perofrmance gains.
If the time taken to do the test and branch is really significant
On May 25, 2006, at 13:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
jmp *4($esp)
This is slightly faster than addl, ret.
The point is that this is only executed in the error case.
But my micro scale benchmarks are extremely influenced by changes in
branch prediction. I still wonder how this would perfor
Hi,
Projects, students and mentors for SoC 2006 are now listed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode
(you may edit it to link to your blog, website, or wiki page).
Cheers,
Manuel.
On 25/05/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel, I think it is not a problem that this info
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20060525 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20060525/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:11:59PM +0100, Joern RENNECKE wrote:
> In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-05/msg00604.html, you wrote:
>
> >The sequence of call, test, jne (or slight variations) occurs in
> >1000's of places, if a better alternative can be found there could be
> >significant perofrmance
GCC 4.1.1 has been released.
This release is a bug-fix release for problems in GCC 4.0.2. GCC
4.1.1 contains changes to correct regressions from previous releases,
but no new features.
This release is available from the FTP servers listed here:
http://www.gnu.org/order/ftp.html
The releas
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.1.1 has been released.
This release is a bug-fix release for problems in GCC 4.0.2. GCC
[...]
Do you mean "a bug-fix release for problems in GCC 4.1.0"?
All the best,
Roberto
--
Prof. Roberto Bagnara
Computer Science Group
Department of Mathematics, University
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.1.1 has been released.
This release is a bug-fix release for problems in GCC 4.0.2. GCC
4.1.1 contains changes to correct regressions from previous releases,
but no new features.
This release is available from the FTP servers listed here:
http://www.gnu.org/ord
You won't be able to. You're going to need to write your own code that,
during the conversion of the tree to RTL, creates RTL expressions which
indicate that the memory references use segment registers. This probably
won't be easy since there are a lot of contexts where your "far" pointer
can be
24 matches
Mail list logo
