On May 16, 2006, at 7:39 PM, fsshl plinlin wrote:
Dear gcc and/or apple OS X 7.9 users:
Union-Souths-Computer:~/gcc-5250 UnionSouth$ cat config.log
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
configure:595: chec
hi,
Does gcc support Simple Chinese language for now? Is there anyone
working on this?
Thanks.
Hi,
Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute
them under GPL + libgcc exception clause license. He denied that
request and so, after doin
Diego Novillo wrote on 05/01/06 12:07:
> The x86 box that runs SPEC2000 daily has hardware problems.
>
It's now working again.
http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.i686/gcc/
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
| asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
| transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute
| them under GPL + libgcc exception
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
> | asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
> | transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| As far as I understand we (GCC) have to develop our own codes
| independently of glibc unless RMS agrees to have copies/forks of
| glibc code in GCC (this includes license changes to GPL + libgcc exception
| like in this case). What is fine a
王 启 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building the cross-toolchain for mipsel on x86 redhat pc. Now I can
> build the gcc for c using following configuration. ./configure
> --prefix=/opt/xuelian-toolchain/mipsel-linux-glibc --target=mipsel-linux
> --enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-languages=c
> --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Mohamed Boukaa wrote:
> --->Also when I compile a simple program by myself I got :
>
> ~ $ ./testaz
> bash: ./testaz: Permission denied
> However the portage is working fine , it can compile C
On May 17, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Eric Fisher wrote:
Does gcc support Simple Chinese language for now? Is there anyone
working on this?
I think you'll want to talk with the GNU translation project, they do
all of this stuff, we just add whatever they do to gcc.
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I
> asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math
> transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute
> them under GPL + libgcc exception clause license. He de
On 15 May 2006 15:47, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> [rA + rB] = [rA + rB] & 3;
> 1. SRC rB -> rD
> 2. SRC rA -> RC
> 3. DEST rB -> rD
> 4. DEST rA -> RC
> last 3 changes. If the subsequent call to apply_change_group fails we
> end up with:
>
> [rA + rB] = [rA + rD] & 3;
> Which now could still be i
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:09:00AM +0800, Rémy Saissy wrote:
> To manage the manipulation of the register class, I added entries in
> the i386.md file.
>
> ;; get a value from a segment register.
> (define_insn "store_seg"
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "")
>(match_o
Hi Dave,
thanks for your comments.
> Doesn't this mean that your insn patterns should be using numerical (aka
> "matching") constraints?
Oh we are using matching constraints. But of course nobody except reload does
care
about them. If the only constraints for an operand are matching constrain
I am (finally...) starting the 4.1.1 RC1 build.
Please do not check in any changes on the 4.1 branch, even if previous
approved.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
I noticed that http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html only lists the build
status of GCC up to 4.0.x. Do you need a volunteer to create a page
for 4.1.x?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
good question, actually I did not know where is the error too.
to solve by easy, can you just email me a cc binary of (MAC OS X 7.9,
apple G5)yours by email?
Union-Souths-Computer:~/Developer/usr/local/bin UnionSouth$ ./gcc
../../../try.cgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or
directory
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:17:33AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I noticed that http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html only lists the build
> status of GCC up to 4.0.x. Do you need a volunteer to create a page
> for 4.1.x?
I maintain the GCC build status lists and have gotten way, way behind.
Creat
On May 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, fsshl plinlin wrote:
Union-Souths-Computer:~/Developer/usr/local/bin UnionSouth$ ./gcc
../../../try.cgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or
directory
This list is for developers of gcc. You should be using gcc-help.
FWIW you need more than jus
> Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | As far as I understand we (GCC) have to develop our own codes
> | independently of glibc unless RMS agrees to have copies/forks of
> | glibc code in GCC (this includes license changes to GPL + libgcc exception
> | like in this case). What is fin
qwangpolestar wrote:
> Hi, David
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> I am using gcc-3.2.2 and glibc-2.3.2. Maybe it's too old.
> How about yours?
>
I never used anything earlier than 3.3.0 on mips. Basic ffi call support
for mips existed in that version. We added ffi closures in 4.0 IIRC
(although I have back p
22 matches
Mail list logo
