Lese selbst:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/deutschland/2005/d0405-13.html
Neue Dokumente:
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/87647
Botschafter in Kiew beschwerte sich noch 2004:
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/85735
Traumzie
Lese selbst:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/59427
Lese selbst:
http://brandenburg.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/poetschke.html
Lese selbst:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/meldungen/2005/m0105-19.html
Lese selbst:
http://brandenburg.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/poetschke.html
Full Article:
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,353274,00.html
Lese selbst:
http://bz.berlin1.de/archiv/041115_pdf/BZ041115_004_GB2IG556.1.htm
Lese selbst:
http://www.zdf.de/ZDFde/inhalt/7/0,1872,503,00.html
http://www.libasoli.de/2004/ethnoclans%20spiegel50_04.html
hi,
i came to the gcc lists looking to email people about a particular
matter [to follow] and noted that the list archives are suffering
from exactly the same problem that i am - spam that's going via
collab.net.
can i recommend to everyone that you contact collab.net and
get them to deal with it
Lese selbst:
http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,338652,00.html
Lese selbst:
http://bz.berlin1.de/archiv/041115_pdf/BZ041115_004_GB2IG556.1.htm
Ulrich Weigand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would appear the problem is this patch:
> 2005-05-12 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 2005-04-04 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * testsuite/Makefile.am (check-local): Remove.
The problem is that this change is missing.
In fact, tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 contradicts itself if given
the two (C language) pointer types "char *" and "const char *". Asking
the langhook if they are compatible, it says no. But then in the
section that reads
/* Pointers and references are equivalent once we get to GENERIC,
On 5/15/05, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In fact, tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 contradicts itself if given
> the two (C language) pointer types "char *" and "const char *". Asking
> the langhook if they are compatible, it says no. But then in the
> section that reads
>
Lese selbst:
http://www.zdf.de/ZDFde/inhalt/7/0,1872,503,00.html
http://www.libasoli.de/2004/ethnoclans%20spiegel50_04.html
Lese selbst:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/deutschland/2005/d0305-14.html
Jetzt weiss man auch, wie es dazu kommt, dass Drogen, Waffen & Handy's in die
Haende der Knacki's gelangen!
GEWALTEXZESS:
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,345203,00.html
Politiker zerreißt Menschenrechtsbericht:
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,325983,00.html
Schily = Hitler
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,345929,00.html
Schily wehrt sich gegen Hitler-Vergleich
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> It would appear the problem is this patch:
> 2005-05-12 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 2005-04-04 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * testsuite/Makefile.am (check-local): Remove.
> (curent_symbols.txt): Likewise.
>
Lese selbst:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/meldungen/2005/m0105-19.html
So, fold_indirect_ref is used in places where we explicitly deal with
lvalues, like in the vararg optimizations in builtins.c and in
gimplfiy_expr. It is also used to perform optimizations that temp1.C
checks - which originates from gimplify_modify_expr_rhs where in turn
we know we're dealing wit
Auslaenderbanden terrorisieren Wahlkampf - deutsche Buerger trauen sich nicht
ihre Meinung zu sagen!
Weiter auf:
http://www.npd-nrw.net/aktuelles/03_2005/ak_presse_nrw_1603.htm
Auslaender ueberfallen nationale Aktivisten:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/meldungen/2005/m0505-13.html
http://www.npd.de
Lese selbst:
http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,338652,00.html
Lese selbst:
http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,338652,00.html
i am trying to port a front end to gcc,
and i am confused with the gc,
i see from the file gengtype.c, it can generate many files automaticlly,
but i don`t understand the rule to generate it, i can only understand
firstly use the yacc to analysize the gtfiles, then output something ,
and this is ju
Lese selbst:
http://www.jn-bw.de/texte/zeitgeschichte/verbrechen_der_frau.htm
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Richard Guenther wrote:
> What can be done about this issues? First, we can use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
> unconditionally in fold_indirect_ref and only break some optimizations
> (like temp1.C). Second, we can declare fold_indirect_ref being unsafe
> about types and deal with this
Lese selbst:
http://www.die-kommenden.net/dk/zeitgeschichte/graeberschaendung.htm
Roger Sayle wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2005, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>>What can be done about this issues? First, we can use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
>>unconditionally in fold_indirect_ref and only break some optimizations
>>(like temp1.C). Second, we can declare fold_indirect_ref being unsafe
>>about t
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ulrich Weigand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It would appear the problem is this patch:
2005-05-12 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2005-04-04 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* testsuite/Makefile.am (check-local): Remove.
The problem is that this change is
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
It also looks like this patch has been backported to 3.4 branch but not to
4.0 branch? Because 4.0 branch builds are still creating
libstdc++-abi.sum, while 3.4 branch builds no longer do, the ABI tests
having been subsumed in the main libstdc++.sum for mainline and 3.4
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Exactly which optimization do we miss by changing:
> >
> > /* *&p => p */
> > - if (lang_hooks.types_compatible_p (type, optype))
> > + if (type == optype)
> > return op;
>
> I don't know - maybe stripping sign casts. But if w
Lese selbst:
http://www.zdf.de/ZDFde/inhalt/7/0,1872,503,00.html
http://www.libasoli.de/2004/ethnoclans%20spiegel50_04.html
re-sent due to it being classified as spam by the gnu.org ml server :)
- Forwarded message from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outs
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I really do appreciate your help, such changes need my approval.
> We are in a freeze situation, which means I might be spinning a release
> at any moment. Please consult with me in future in such situations.
I apologize for the unapproved chec
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
While I really do appreciate your help, such changes need my approval.
We are in a freeze situation, which means I might be spinning a release
at any moment. Please consult with me in future in such situations.
I apologize for the
On 5/13/05, Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 5/13/05, Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Anybody with the same problem?
> >
> > maybe, maybe not, I'm in an endless loop at
>
> Yes, that's the same problem, if I do a pa
Full Article:
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,353274,00.html
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20050515 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20050515/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 CVS branch
with the following options: -D2005-05-15 17:43 UTC
You'll
William Beebe writes:
>
>If you want that kind of cross referencing, then you shouild look at
Doxygen (http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/)
>
I need the cross-reference output from the compiler because I want to write
a source code browser like LXR. That's why I asked the question. Again,
Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Greg Schafer wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:44:59PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 3.4.4 RC2 is now available here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050512
There are just a few changes from RC1 to fix critical problems people
experienced with RC1.
Please dow
Short answer, no.
I think we'd welcome patches to make gcc work great on boxes like this;
but, it is a hard problem, and the right patches are invariably going
to be hard to produce. The problem is the right patches will need to
be target independent, so that support could be added for any simi
On May 15, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
The multiple exit comes bounds checking (which VRP does not remove
still
because we don't pull out a load of the length).
If we add -fno-bounds-checks, we get:
Test.java:7: note: not vectorized: too many BBs in loop.
Test.java:11: note: not vecto
GEWALTEXZESS:
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,345203,00.html
Politiker zerreißt Menschenrechtsbericht:
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,325983,00.html
Schily = Hitler
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,345929,00.html
Schily wehrt sich gegen Hitler-Vergleich
Lese selbst:
http://bz.berlin1.de/archiv/041115_pdf/BZ041115_004_GB2IG556.1.htm
And I'll say it again. If you want what LXR provides (and yes, I
looked it up) then get Doxygen. It runs on every platform, comes
bundled with many distributions, and it will give you an output in
HTML that will give you every cross-reference you care to name. If you
want something that you can fur
mike, hi, thank you for replying.
[my response is going direct to list to my original post because i am not
subscribed on-list.]
unfortunately, integration of aspex's proprietary tool-chain - written
in modula-2 - is extremely unlikely to ever be integrated into gcc.
secondly, the code it genera
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> how we are progressing gcc to deal with hardware like this. To the
> extent technologies like that can make it perform well, I think that is
> the direction gcc is headed, beyond that, if you are interested in
> doing the work, you'
Lese selbst:
http://www.jn-bw.de/texte/zeitgeschichte/verbrechen_der_frau.htm
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> See the OpenMP work and the autovectorization work for some ideas on
> how we are progressing gcc to deal with hardware like this. To the
> extent technologies like that can make it perform well, I think that is
> the direction gcc
Polizeiexperten warnen: Ethnisch abgeschottete Mafia-Clans sind kaum noch zu
durchdringen. Die Gerichte tragen Mitschuld.
Weiter auf:
http://www.libasoli.de/2004/ethnoclans%20spiegel50_04.html
Lese selbst:
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/nachrichten/wirtschaft/finanzen/deutschland/85815
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 01:14 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
i think you may find that a less stringent goal - of doing
"outsourcing" - may result in an intermediate useable compromise
that would keep most people happy or at least a whole damn lot
more happy than they are at the
Lese selbst:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/meldungen/2005/m0105-19.html
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> So I guess I should rephrase $SUBJECT as: How can we properly set the
>> pkgconfig directory to $(prefix)/libdata/ for FreeBSD and potentially
>> others?
> Using $(prefix)/libdata without any doubt would be wrong.
By "potentially others" I was referr
Lese selbst:
http://bz.berlin1.de/archiv/041115_pdf/BZ041115_004_GB2IG556.1.htm
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 01:01 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
unfortunately, integration of aspex's proprietary tool-chain - written
in modula-2 - is extremely unlikely to ever be integrated into gcc.
Right. But the ideas could be. The ideas in some respects are more
important than
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 03:55 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
the list archives are suffering from exactly the same problem that i
am - spam
This is massively off-topic for this list.
Lese selbst:
http://www.npd.de/npd_info/deutschland/2005/d0405-13.html
Neue Dokumente:
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/87647
Botschafter in Kiew beschwerte sich noch 2004:
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/85735
Traumzie
Lese selbst:
http://www.zdf.de/ZDFde/inhalt/7/0,1872,503,00.html
http://www.libasoli.de/2004/ethnoclans%20spiegel50_04.html
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:49:29PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 03:55 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
> >the list archives are suffering from exactly the same problem that i
> >am - spam
>
> This is massively off-topic for this list.
sorry.
Lese selbst:
http://www.my-rocknord.de/viewtopic.php?t=1018&sid=3ce6385b1dee88cb02447f566a2da68d
.. damit Sie nicht als der erste Kanzler in die deutsche Geschichte eingehen,
der Untertanen verboten hat, aus ihren Fenstern auf die Strasse zu gucken -
selbst Nazis und Stalinisten haben niemals ei
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:04:40PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 01:14 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
> > i think you may find that a less stringent goal - of doing
> > "outsourcing" - may result in an intermediate useable compromise
> > that would keep most pe
Full Article:
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,344374,00.html
Polizeiexperten warnen: Ethnisch abgeschottete Mafia-Clans sind kaum noch zu
durchdringen. Die Gerichte tragen Mitschuld.
Weiter auf:
http://www.libasoli.de/2004/ethnoclans%20spiegel50_04.html
The only link to the GCC wiki is the initial Jan 27
announcement. I think a link to
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ should be added to the
Documention links on the left of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/ page.
Thanks.
Josh Cogliati
On Sun, 15 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The only link to the GCC wiki is the initial Jan 27
> announcement. I think a link to
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ should be added to the
> Documention links on the left of the
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ page.
Indeed I'll make this change and add a link to
This test doesn't support testing an installed compiler.
The root of the problem is that the test generator is written as a C
program, which is expected to be run on the host system. As a result,
we need to compile on the host system, which is why we need HOSTCC and
HOSTCFLAGS in struct-layout-1.e
Hi,
The file libiberty/xstrerror.c contains the following fragment
#ifdef VMS
#include
#if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__) && !defined (__HIDE_FORBIDDEN_NAMES)
extern char *strerror (int,...);
#define DONT_DECLARE_STRERROR
#endif
#endif /* VMS */
#ifndef DONT_DECL
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyhow, why do we install libiberty.a, but not the libiberty include
> files?
I expect this dates back to the time when libiberty was mainly just a
replacement for missing system functions, and there were no particular
header files associated with it.
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 04:11 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
*click* - so you you... ooo :)
holy cow.
you looked at valarray,
No, not really, I'm not a library guy. I know of almost nothing of the
space, the applications or the tricks people play, but...
and went "how
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The file libiberty/xstrerror.c contains the following fragment
>
> #ifdef VMS
> #include
> #if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__) && !defined (__HIDE_FORBIDDEN_NAMES)
> extern char *strerror (int,...);
> #define DONT_DECLARE_STRERROR
>
"zouq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please don't start a new thread by replying to a message on an
existing thread. Just send a new message, instead. Otherwise your
message goes in the wrong place for people who use threaded e-mail
readers.
> i am trying to port a front end to gcc,
> and i am co
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I expect this dates back to the time when libiberty was mainly just a
replacement for missing system functions, and there were no particular
header files associated with it. Plus, if you configure with
--enable-shared, you will get a shared libiberty which probably needs
to
Kriang Lerdsuwanakij wrote:
I see that either the patch (actually only one of the two fixes this issue:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01283.html ) applied or
leave the current behavior as is. It would do more harm than good
if we try to do something different.
OK. Do you happen to
> Personally, I think we should default to not installing libiberty.a,
> though we should install libiberty.so if we build it.
And fix PR other/16513 in the process.
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou wrote:
Personally, I think we should default to not installing libiberty.a,
though we should install libiberty.so if we build it.
And fix PR other/16513 in the process.
It's presumably a matter of adding the right libiberty configure option
from the top-level by default. Would you
> It's presumably a matter of adding the right libiberty configure option
> from the top-level by default. Would you care to take a try? It sounds
> like Ian would probably approve it, or maybe one of our build
> maintainers would.
I'll try, but I don't guarantee anything. IIRC I tried before f
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:23:01AM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> Probably the reason that fold_unary
> doesn't call fold_indirect_ref is precisely because it is unsafe.
Probably fold_indirect_ref way way way post-dates fold_unary.
r~
78 matches
Mail list logo
