> Since it looks like a lot of the failures
> in both cases are lto, vect and stack-align
> tests, I suspect that of the ~3100 tests
> that were added, we have a number of new
> tests that won't work on when compiling
> specifically for an erc32 (-mcpu=cypress).
The results can hardly be analyzed,
Hi,
Thanks to Eric Botcazou, David Miller, and
Ranier Orth, sparc-rtems is testable again.
It appears to be approximately the same as
the 4.6 results but I would appreciate
a double check from a sparc maintainer.
Since it looks like a lot of the failures
in both cases are lto, vect and stack-ali
