> Since it looks like a lot of the failures > in both cases are lto, vect and stack-align > tests, I suspect that of the ~3100 tests > that were added, we have a number of new > tests that won't work on when compiling > specifically for an erc32 (-mcpu=cypress).
The results can hardly be analyzed, there are too many failures, although they probably come from a small number of problems. You should consider looking into the gazillions of execution failures, determining why they fail (they pass on Solaris or Linux) and submit patches to XFAIL/SKIP them for sparc-rtems. -- Eric Botcazou
