o. So some kind of
> > version information, about not using sphinx plugins, etc. would be
> > appreciated.
[...]
> On the subject of packaging: when building libgccjit,
> --enable-host-shared is needed, to get position-independent code, which
> will slow down the regular com
Hello All,
Since I am releasing MELT as a plugin (GPLv3+ licensed, FSF copyrighted), I
would like to package the documentation, by changing the
contrib/make-melt-source-tar.sh shell script of the MELT branch so that it
packages appropriate *.texi files.
As you probably know, MELT documentation i
org/wiki/MiddleEndLispTranslator and other MELT related
pages on GCC wiki.
Basile Starynkevitch wrote in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2010/03/msg00047.html
Now, one of the issues about MELT & Debian packaging is the fact that
melt-runtime.c (the source of melt.so plugin) uses GTY
http://gcc.gnu.or
On 14/03/10 21:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.03.2010 13:15, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Basile Starynkevitch wrote in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2010/03/msg00047.html
Now, one of the issues about MELT & Debian packaging is the fact that
melt-runtime.c (the source of melt.so pl
On 14.03.2010 13:15, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Basile Starynkevitch wrote in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2010/03/msg00047.html
Now, one of the issues about MELT & Debian packaging is the fact that
melt-runtime.c (the source of melt.so plugin) uses GTY
http://gcc.gnu.org/online
Basile Starynkevitch wrote in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2010/03/msg00047.html
Now, one of the issues about MELT & Debian packaging is the fact that
melt-runtime.c (the source of melt.so plugin) uses GTY
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Type-Information.html#Type-Informa
77662
sh versions of them, too.
Is there any documentation on how the new packaging mechanism works?
It's not a new packaging mechanism and it doesn't require any
adjustment; the entire thing should Just Work.
If you happen to need to be able to do this with old tools,
you can try http://ke
"Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote (in part):
> > Telling the dynamic linker about a dynamic libgcc is still a problem,
> > but that is a problem whereever you put the compiler.
>
> If I'm not interested in build a dynamically linked gcc, or building
> libgcc and re
Ian Lance Taylor wrote (in part):
> Telling the dynamic linker about a dynamic libgcc is still a problem,
> but that is a problem whereever you put the compiler.
If I'm not interested in build a dynamically linked gcc, or building
libgcc and related libraries as dynamic libraries, can I simply as
anks.
>
> Which versions qualify as "recent" above? GCC 3.4, or 4.0, or both?
Since at least 3.3.
> Is there any documentation on how the new packaging mechanism works?
It's not a new packaging mechanism and it doesn't require any
adjustment; the entire thing should Just Work.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
e any documentation on how the new packaging mechanism works?
If this was discussed on this list, would you happen to know approximately,
when (so I can do a search of the archives)?
"Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given a binary distibution of GCC, for example, built to install under
> /usr/local, is it possible to configure and build the compiler in such a
> way that a binary packaging method such as RPM can allow a user to specify
&g
Given a binary distibution of GCC, for example, built to install under
/usr/local, is it possible to configure and build the compiler in such a
way that a binary packaging method such as RPM can allow a user to specify
an alternate installation point (perhaps /opt, or even the user's
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
>> When I look in gcc-4.0.0-20050410/INSTALL at specific.html
> Oh, BTW, it seems the internal links in that page are b0rked in the usual
> sort of way, owing to the mangling of 'special' characters. A link like:
>
> *-ibm-aix*
>
> doesn't actually link up
Original Message
>From: Kate Minola
>Sent: 12 April 2005 16:15
> When I look in gcc-4.0.0-20050410/INSTALL at specific.html
Oh, BTW, it seems the internal links in that page are b0rked in the usual
sort of way, owing to the mangling of 'special' characters. A link like:
*-ibm-aix*
do
16 matches
Mail list logo
