Hi,
This is the x32 project status update:
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
There are several changes:
1. We changed x32 kernel to use the 64bit filesystem interface (LFS) as well as
64bit time_t. We are targeting Linux kernel 3.3.
2. I backported x32 support to glibc 2.14, 2.13, 2.12
Hi,
This is the x32 project status update:
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
We have settled down on a preliminary system call number
scheme:
1. In kernel, x86-64 and x32 share the same system call slot if they
are the same.
2. First 512 system call slots are reserved for common and x86-64
Hi,
This is the x32 project status update:
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
With the latest x32 kernel, glibc, gcc and gdb, everything
works, including core dump and vDSO.
I'd like to see x32 kernel system call numbers be finalized
so that people don't have to recompile everyth
LKML; x32-...@googlegroups.com; Anvin, H
Peter
Subject: Re: X32 project status update
On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote:
> This is the x32 project status update:
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
>
I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically
l
to...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:39 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>> To: Anvin, H Peter
>>> Cc: x32-...@googlegroups.com; Arnd Bergmann; GCC Development; GNU C Library;
>>> LKML
>>> Subject: Re: X32 project status update
>>>
>>> On
d unsure for fanotify_mark.
H.J.
> ---
>> -Original Message-
>> From: H.J. Lu [hjl.to...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:39 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> To: Anvin, H Peter
>> Cc: x32-...@googlegroups.com; Arnd Bergmann; GCC Development; GNU C Li
.J. Lu [hjl.to...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:39 PM Pacific Standard Time
> To: Anvin, H Peter
> Cc: x32-...@googlegroups.com; Arnd Bergmann; GCC Development; GNU C Library;
> LKML
> Subject: Re: X32 project status update
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:55 AM, H. Pet
U C Library;
LKML
Subject: Re: X32 project status update
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:55 AM, H. Peter Anvin
wrote:
> On 05/21/2011 09:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
On 05/21/2011 09:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>> This is the x32 project status update:
>>>>
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> This is the x32 project status update:
>>>
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
>>>
&g
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote:
>> This is the x32 project status update:
>>
>> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
>>
>
> I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically
>
On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote:
> This is the x32 project status update:
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
>
I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically
looks all good, but the system call table appears to
diverge from the x86_64 list f
Hi,
This is the x32 project status update:
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
With the latest x32 kernel semctl bug fix, C, C++ and Fortran
test results on GCC x32 branch only show one serious bug:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcspn.c execution, -O1
It is due to the combine
13 matches
Mail list logo
