On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote: >> This is the x32 project status update: >> >> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ >> > > I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically > looks all good, but the system call table appears to > diverge from the x86_64 list for no (documented) reason, > in the calls above 302. Is that intentional? > > I can see why you might want to keep the numbers identical, > but if they are already different, why not use the generic > system call table from asm-generic/unistd.h for the new > ABI?
We can sort it out when we start merging x32 kernel changes. -- H.J.
