Quoting Gerald Pfeifer :
This has been forwarded to the steering committee (thanks, David)
and the FSF and we are pushing to get it addressed.
What is the current status on this?
As we go into phase 1 of gcc 4.6, we are likely to fall back on
code/documentation consistency unless/until we hav
This has been forwarded to the steering committee (thanks, David)
and the FSF and we are pushing to get it addressed.
Gerald
Joern Rennecke wrote:
> References: <4ae6e471.4020...@starynkevitch.net>
>
> <4ae70c5e.4050...@starynkevitch.net>
> <84fc9c000910270839v2d9efe0dw829c8647f361c...@mail.gmail.com>
> <4ae7164d.9010...@starynkevitch.net>
> <84fc9c000910270855w736df367qe511d8db280aa...@mail.gmail.com>
> <2dc303d6091027
Adding and maintaining target hooks is unnecessarily hard at the moment,
because the definition is spread across three places, and these are supposed
to be kept in sync. The code is necessarily kept more or less in sync because
it generally fails to compile or work when it isn't - and if someone
