Joern Rennecke wrote:
> References: <4ae6e471.4020...@starynkevitch.net>
> <mcr3a54lwb4....@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
> <4ae70c5e.4050...@starynkevitch.net>
> <84fc9c000910270839v2d9efe0dw829c8647f361c...@mail.gmail.com>
> <4ae7164d.9010...@starynkevitch.net>
> <84fc9c000910270855w736df367qe511d8db280aa...@mail.gmail.com>
> <2dc303d60910271056h17038110ib63c53cfa374f...@mail.gmail.com>
> <20091102074959.p8410ulv28sg0w44-nzly...@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <20091105082557.75c2estyoog8ss0c-nzly...@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <-2186575642631489...@unknownmsgid>
[ Never seen that before, looks as if someone used "%i" when they probably
meant "%u" or "%x"! ]
> <55692dc10911050634y54a5fea7jd2ba773086cda...@mail.gmail.com>
> <00d801ca5e34$e5384160$afa8c4...@fursin@inria.fr>
> <20091223101256.z6a8ug32o8k84o4o-nzly...@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <20091223193244.hqaet9zf488gw844-nzly...@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <pine.lnx.4.64.0912241209420.32...@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
> <20100113032220.pzerwhbtog0w4gsk-nzly...@webmail.spamcop.net>
> <pine.lnx.4.64.1001131343010.2...@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
> <20100113110917.vqaoqpyyc0ck8gso-nzly...@webmail.spamcop.net>
That didn't "start a new thread"!
cheers,
DaveK
