Re: Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer

2010-03-30 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On 03/30/2010 05:14 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Samuel Tardieu  wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> GCC 4.5.0 will ship with support for lm32. This is an IP which can be >>> configured in several ways (with

Re: Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer

2010-03-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 03/30/2010 05:14 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Samuel Tardieu wrote: Hi. GCC 4.5.0 will ship with support for lm32. This is an IP which can be configured in several ways (with or without barrel shifter, and with or without a hardware multiplier). To be u

Re: Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer

2010-03-30 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Samuel Tardieu wrote: > Hi. > > GCC 4.5.0 will ship with support for lm32. This is an IP which can be > configured in several ways (with or without barrel shifter, and with or > without a hardware multiplier). > > To be usable in all cases, it has to support multi

Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer

2010-03-30 Thread Samuel Tardieu
Hi. GCC 4.5.0 will ship with support for lm32. This is an IP which can be configured in several ways (with or without barrel shifter, and with or without a hardware multiplier). To be usable in all cases, it has to support multilib. The support is present but broken: the "MULTILIB_OPTIONS" variab