Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:23:30PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >>By the way, the public-inbox software >>(), as recently mentioned in a >>different thread discussing deficiencies of Mailman'

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi! On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > By the way, the public-inbox software > (), as recently mentioned in a > different thread discussing deficiencies of Mailman's Pipermail, also > does support this: >

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:56:04PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>>I was thinking we might be able to trick pipermail (the web archiver >>>component) to simply name the message web urls after some function of >>>the message-id instead of the sequence number. Will give this a try >>>very shortly.

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi - > >I was thinking we might be able to trick pipermail (the web archiver > >component) to simply name the message web urls after some function of > >the message-id instead of the sequence number. Will give this a try > >very shortly. > > I just want to go on record as saying that I think thi

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 06:14:55AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>Such a service is not currently available on sourceware, but it'd be >>possible to implement: as messages come in, you'd build a database >>mapping from the Message-ID header to "current Mailman's Pipermail >>URL". > >I was thinkin

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >On 2020-05-06T10:44:46-0400, "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc" > wrote: >>>Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really need those, we >>>reference those in commit messages, other mails, bugzilla etc. > >>It would be good to have a

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi - > Such a service is not currently available on sourceware, but it'd be > possible to implement: as messages come in, you'd build a database > mapping from the Message-ID header to "current Mailman's Pipermail URL". I was thinking we might be able to trick pipermail (the web archiver componen

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi! On 2020-05-06T10:44:46-0400, "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc" wrote: >> Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really >> need those, we reference those in commit messages, other mails, bugzilla >> etc. > It would be good to have another way of making permanent URLs for > individual messages

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:54:06PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote: >may I also chime in with a related (to some extent), even though a separate >issue? It seems URL rewriting rules designed to replace old-style > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml//current > >URLs pointing to monthly digests to current ones >

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:11:39PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >Hi! > >Last week after sending status report mails to gcc mailing list, >I've opened the web archive and copied the URLs of those status reports >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232267.html >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/g

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi, >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html >> Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small >> numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like >> 545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really >> need those, we re

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi, >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html >> Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small >> numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like >> 545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really >> need those, we re

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi - > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html > Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small > numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like > 545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really > need those, we referen

Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi! Last week after sending status report mails to gcc mailing list, I've opened the web archive and copied the URLs of those status reports https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232267.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232268.html and checked them into gcc-wwwdocs git c3162