> I wasn't under those recipients.
For the sake of completeness, I wasn't among them either. But I can only
offer diligent review of SPARC specific patches these days and help for
severe problem reports.
--
Eric Botcazou
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
We are seeing tests posted, at least, even if the volume isn't what
it probably should be for a primary.
sparc-solaris2.10+ has been tested twice on trunk since
stage one for gcc-4.4 opened. This is unacceptable, and in the lower
bounds even for a secondary target. (All o
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
Please keep it as primary. I try to give my best to help out.
I do daily testing on 2.8/2.10. Currently 2.8 is broken.
You do seem to be the most active solaris contributor at the moment,
and that is encouraging. Thanks for your hard work.
Any chance you could post the
> We are seeing tests posted, at least, even if the volume isn't what
> it probably should be for a primary.
sparc-solaris2.10+ has been tested twice on trunk since
stage one for gcc-4.4 opened. This is unacceptable, and in the lower
bounds even for a secondary target. (All of which have more reg
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Given that the set of posted solaris test results for trunk during the
> > last four months barely requires two hands:
> >...
> > I propose moving
> >
> > sparc-sun-solaris2.10
> >
> > from primary to secondary on
> Please keep it as primary. I try to give my best to help out.
>
> I do daily testing on 2.8/2.10. Currently 2.8 is broken.
You do seem to be the most active solaris contributor at the moment,
and that is encouraging. Thanks for your hard work.
Any chance you could post the results of your dai
>Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Given that the set of posted solaris test results for trunk during the
>last four months barely requires two hands:
>
>2008-01
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01474.html
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01460.html
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
I propose moving
sparc-sun-solaris2.10
from primary to secondary on this page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html
Thoughts?
Please keep it as primary. I try to give my best to help out.
I do daily testing on 2.8/2.10. Currently 2.8 is broken.
I work in a comp
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given that the set of posted solaris test results for trunk during the
> last four months barely requires two hands:
>
> 2008-01
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01474.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
