> We are seeing tests posted, at least, even if the volume isn't what > it probably should be for a primary.
sparc-solaris2.10+ has been tested twice on trunk since stage one for gcc-4.4 opened. This is unacceptable, and in the lower bounds even for a secondary target. (All of which have more regular testing than solaris 2.10+). Please note that I have sent private mail to likely solaris testers previous to this asking for testing and have gotten no reply or action. Thus, my public message. > I'm not saying that I support Benjamin's proposal, but I suggest that > it be interpreted as a request, coupled with an implied threat: if > you want a platform to continue as a primary platform, there has to > be testing, as well as assistance to fix problems when they crop up. > If no one tests the trunk on a platform for months at a time, because > they "move slowly and cautiously", the quality of that port will > seriously decline. Exactly. Thanks Joe. -benjamin
