Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-19 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:57:34PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> How do I subscribe gnu-abi mailing list? The project page just >> points to the mailing list archive. There is no option to subscribe >> it. > > To subscribe sent email to gnu-abi-

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-19 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:57:34PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> How do I subscribe gnu-abi mailing list? The project page just >> points to the mailing list archive. There is no option to subscribe >> it. > > To subscribe sent email to gnu-abi-

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-19 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.02.19 at 12:57 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Jose E. Marchesi >> wrote: >> > >> > > Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] >> > >> > Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:57:34PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > How do I subscribe gnu-abi mailing list? The project page just > points to the mailing list archive. There is no option to subscribe > it. To subscribe sent email to gnu-abi-subscr...@sourceware.org Or use the subscribe form at https://s

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-19 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.02.19 at 12:57 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Jose E. Marchesi > wrote: > > > > > Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] > > > > Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. > > > > [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org > > [2] https

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-19 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > > > Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] > > Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. > > [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org > [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/ > > The link to the "GNU GABI pr

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-16 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 15/02/16 17:36, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> you as a group admin can do that, others cannot join >> without creating a account at google (which requires >> the acceptance of the google tos etc). > > that is annoying i didn't know about list+subscr...@g

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Pedro Alves
On 02/15/2016 08:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Frank Ch. Eigler: >> Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. >> >> [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org >> [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/ > > And to subscribe, send mail to . > Somehow, this is missing on the web page above. > One can

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Frank Ch. Eigler: > mark wrote: > >> [...] >>> [...] >>> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO. >>> > +1 >>> +1 >> >> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] > > Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. > > [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Szabolcs Nagy: > you as a group admin can do that, others cannot join > without creating a account at google (which requires > the acceptance of the google tos etc). It should be possible to subscribe to the list by sending an empty email message to . At least it works for me, and I currently

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 15, 2016, f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote: > mark wrote: >> [...] >>> [...] >>> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO. >>> > +1 >>> +1 >> >> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] > Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 15 Feb 2016 17:17, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 15, 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > >> they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their > >> machine. > > > complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish. > > See

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
Mike, On Feb 15, 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their >> machine. > complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish. See https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 15, 2016, "H.J. Lu" wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> I, for one, have closed my Google account several Valentine's Days >> ago, for privacy reasons, and this makes the archives of lists hidden >> there unusable for me. > Anyone can subscribe Linux-ABI g

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > they need to allow google to execute javascript code on their > > machine. > > complaining that the web interface executes JS is a bit luddite-ish. If the JS in question is nonfree it's immediately relevant to appropriateness for any GNU project us

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > Please don't spread false information. Anyone can subscribe Linux-ABI > > group and its archive is to open to everyone. You don't need a gmail > > account > > for any of those. There are quite a few non-gmail users. You don't have > > to take my w

Re: gnu-gabi group (Was: Re: Linux-abi group)

2016-02-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: > On 11-Feb-2016 10:08 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I think that none of the ABI extensions in question are anything to do > > with Linux, the kernel. Rather, they are ABI extensions for userspace in > > the GNU system, which apply the same under mult

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
> Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi/ The link to the "GNU GABI project web page" in https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-gabi is brok

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
mark wrote: > [...] >> [...] >> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO. >> > +1 >> +1 > > Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist. [...] Done [1] [2]. If y'all need a wiki too, just ask. [1] gnu-g...@sourceware.org [2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gnu-ga

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 15 Feb 2016 16:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 15/02/16 16:03, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem > to make it hard to subscribe and

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 13:37 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > >> If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware > >> where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties coul

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
> +1 > > Since it's GNU tools we're talking about, we'd better use a medium that > we've all already agreed to use, than one that a number of us objects > to. I, for one, have closed my Google account several Valentine's Days > ago, for privacy reasons, and this makes the

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 15/02/16 16:03, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >> wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem to make it hard to subscribe and don't have easy to access archives. Havin

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > > >>> wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem >>> to make it hard to subscribe and don't have easy to access archives. >>> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware >> where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties could join >> to maintain these extensions and ask for clarifications th

Re: gnu-gabi group (Was: Re: Linux-abi group)

2016-02-14 Thread Suprateeka R Hegde
On 11-Feb-2016 09:55 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: On 11-Feb-2016 07:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: H.J, I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. This new discuss

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-12 Thread Pedro Alves
On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware > where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties could join > to maintain these extensions and ask for clarifications that would be > wonderful. I am not a big fa

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-12 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Mark Wielaard wrote: > If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on > sourceware where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties > could join to maintain these extensions and ask for clarifications that > would be wonderful. I am not a b

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-11 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 04:38:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > I think that none of the ABI extensions in question are anything to do > with Linux, the kernel. Rather, they are ABI extensions for userspace in > the GNU system, which apply the same under multiple kernels (but so

Re: gnu-gabi group

2016-02-11 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 04:38:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > I think that none of the ABI extensions in question are anything to do > with Linux, the kernel. Rather, they are ABI extensions for userspace in > the GNU system, which apply the same under multiple kernels (but some of > them may