Richard Biener schrieb:
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I think the fix should be to give an early error message for compiling
from stdin with -save-temps, and then stop the compilation because there's
nowhere to save the intermediate files (given the lack of an input file
name).
Alternatively, inform
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> Alternatively, inform the user that -save-temps is ignored and continue ...
> (I can see people annoyed by foreign Makefiles and tying to get at
> preprocessed
> source with CFLAGS="... -save-temps")
that also makes sense, and would be mor
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Mike Dupont wrote:
>
>> is this known? should I report a bug? any ideas on fixing it, I might
>> be able to do so, it should be simple.
>
> I think the fix should be to give an early error message for compiling
> from
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Creating the temp file yourself has the advantage you know what the
> name is, whereas if GCC creates it you need to look for new files or
> check timestamps to find what name it used.
so we can have three options that I would suggest :
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 09:25, Mike Dupont wrote:
>> Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
>> something with the timestamp as well.
>> I would like to have those files if possible. would that be acceptable?
>
> Why n
On 29 October 2012 10:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 09:25, Mike Dupont wrote:
>> Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
>> something with the timestamp as well.
>> I would like to have those files if possible. would that be acceptable?
>
> Why not just w
On 29 October 2012 09:25, Mike Dupont wrote:
> Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
> something with the timestamp as well.
> I would like to have those files if possible. would that be acceptable?
Why not just write the source to the temp file then invoke GCC on it?
Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
something with the timestamp as well.
I would like to have those files if possible. would that be acceptable?
mike
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Mike Dupont wrote:
>
>> is this known
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Mike Dupont wrote:
> is this known? should I report a bug? any ideas on fixing it, I might
> be able to do so, it should be simple.
I think the fix should be to give an early error message for compiling
from stdin with -save-temps, and then stop the compilation because ther
