On Sat, 9 Nov 2024, Martin Uecker via Gcc wrote:
> BTW: My main practical issue with zero-sized arrays is that the
> UB sanitizers triggers for zero-sized variable arrays.
They are after all UB in standard C. (Note for example that the UB
sanitizers cover all cases of shifts that are undefined
Am Samstag, dem 09.11.2024 um 11:29 +0100 schrieb Alejandro Colomar via Gcc:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 09:38:45AM GMT, Martin Uecker wrote:
> > Am Samstag, dem 09.11.2024 um 00:54 +0100 schrieb Alejandro Colomar via Gcc:
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > I'm in the process of rebasing my __countof__ ch
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 11:34:58AM GMT, Martin Uecker wrote:
> > > You can just eliminate the code for the star as it would now
> > > automatically end up as variable.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Have a lovely day!
> > Alex
>
> Just committed, so you could rebase on trunk now.
Thanks!
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 09:38:45AM GMT, Martin Uecker wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 09.11.2024 um 00:54 +0100 schrieb Alejandro Colomar via Gcc:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > I'm in the process of rebasing my __countof__ changes after your patch
> > that fixes support for [*] and [0].
> >
> > I should update
Am Samstag, dem 09.11.2024 um 00:54 +0100 schrieb Alejandro Colomar via Gcc:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I'm in the process of rebasing my __countof__ changes after your patch
> that fixes support for [*] and [0].
>
> I should update the implementation of the following function:
>
> static bool
>
