On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 09:38:45AM GMT, Martin Uecker wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 09.11.2024 um 00:54 +0100 schrieb Alejandro Colomar via Gcc:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > I'm in the process of rebasing my __countof__ changes after your patch
> > that fixes support for [*] and [0].
> >
> > I should update the implementation of the following function:
> >
> > static bool
> > is_top_array_vla (tree type)
> > {
> > bool zero, star, var;
> > tree d;
> >
> > if (TREE_CODE (type) != ARRAY_TYPE)
> > return false;
> > if (!COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
> > return false;
> >
> > d = TYPE_DOMAIN (type);
> > zero = !TYPE_MAX_VALUE (d);
> > star = (zero && C_TYPE_VARIABLE_SIZE (type));
> > if (star)
> > return true;
> > if (zero)
> > return false;
> >
> > var = (TREE_CODE (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (d)) != INTEGER_CST
> > || TREE_CODE (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (d)) != INTEGER_CST);
> > return var;
> > }
> >
> > The 'star' calculation should be updated. Would you mind proposing an
> > implementation of this function that works with your changes? Thanks!
> >
> You can just eliminate the code for the star as it would now
> automatically end up as variable.Thanks! Have a lovely day! Alex > > Martin -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
