On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 09:41:50AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> Patch for adding score-* and crx-* to obsolete ports below. Last
> contact for SCORE and current crx maintainer CC'd.
I have committed this patch. The crx maintainer (Pompapathi Gadad)
contacted me via private mail and indicated it
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
> > There are four different target configuration headers used for Interix
> > (i386/i386-interix.h i386/i386-interix3.h interix.h interix3.h). Since
> > there's only one Interix target present in GCC, the abstraction implied by
> > four headers - some o
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
* Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096).
I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the responsibility
to get it working.
The deprecation patch has gone in. That means that
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
> > * Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096).
>
> I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the responsibility
> to get it working.
The deprecation patch has gone in. That means that your patch to
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
* Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096).
I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the
responsibility to get it working.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:11:07AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
> > appear to involve a simultaneously maintained set of upstream components
> > that are usable together in their current upstream forms; they got Linux
> > kernel support u
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> I can't quite figure out what the score people are up to, but it doesn't
> appear to involve a simultaneously maintained set of upstream components
> that are usable together in their current upstream forms; they got Linux
> kernel support
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:11:10AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send
> > any other suggestions...
>
> score-* doesn't have a maintainer and score-elf couldn't build libgcc
> last I che
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:11:10AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send
> any other suggestions...
score-* doesn't have a maintainer and score-elf couldn't build libgcc
last I checked (it was also mentioned in your previous message).
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > My inclination would be to move the
> >
> > *-*-freebsd[12] | *-*-freebsd[12].* | *-*-freebsd*aout*)
> > # This is the place-holder for the generic a.out configuration
> > # of FreeBSD. No actual conf
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> My inclination would be to move the
>
> *-*-freebsd[12] | *-*-freebsd[12].* | *-*-freebsd*aout*)
> # This is the place-holder for the generic a.out configuration
> # of FreeBSD. No actual configuration resides here since
> # there was only ever
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send
> > any other suggestions, or say if you wish to volunteer to maintain one
> > of these targets to avoid deprecation
>
> Thanks for
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send
> any other suggestions, or say if you wish to volunteer to maintain one
> of these targets to avoid deprecation
Thanks for doing this, Joseph!
I am not sure how to formally handl
On 28/01/2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> * i[34567]86-*-pe (an alias for Cygwin in config.gcc rather than
> config.sub, so not effectively treated as an alias elsewhere).
Makes sense to me, thank you. (I've never heard of anyone using it, I don't
think it would even matter if you just re
14 matches
Mail list logo
