On Nov 6, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Right now after patches by the Apple folks causes you to need a
newer dwarfutils
I think that is a bug, and that bug has now been fixed. Let me know
if there is any other badness I missed (or introduced along the way).
Right now on the Powe
Eric> Well, yes, did you see anything in what I wrote that argued
differently?
Yes, what I quoted, the comparison with gmp/mpfr and c99 inlining.
Those other problems are irrelevant.
I disagree, they were other examples of breakages.
-eric
> Eric Christopher writes:
Eric> On Nov 7, 2006, at 5:24 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> Eric Christopher writes:
>>
Eric> We're in stage1, breakages happen - see the current fun with
>> gmp/mpfr as
Eric> well as c99 inlining. File a bug or bring a problem up for
>> discussion.
>>
>>
On Nov 7, 2006, at 5:24 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Eric Christopher writes:
Eric> We're in stage1, breakages happen - see the current fun with
gmp/mpfr as
Eric> well as c99 inlining. File a bug or bring a problem up for
discussion.
Yes, breakage happens in Stage 1, but the goal s
> Eric Christopher writes:
Eric> We're in stage1, breakages happen - see the current fun with gmp/mpfr as
Eric> well as c99 inlining. File a bug or bring a problem up for discussion.
Yes, breakage happens in Stage 1, but the goal should be no
breakage. Breakage is by no means inevita
Jack Howarth wrote:
I would more worried about the second issue if gcc 4.2 was
remotely close to release. However at the rate regressions are
being fixed (or not) in gcc 4.2 branch, I wouldn't hold my
breath as to which is released first (gcc 4.2 or Leopard).
Once Leopard is released, Darwin8
On Nov 6, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
Oh and 10.0, 10.1, 10.2 compiling with GCC are all broken (so is
10.3).
I'd probably suggest at least 10.3.9 myself
My take, 10.2 and on should work. I think it is wrong to put things
into darwin.[ch] that don't work on earlier systems.
I would more worried about the second issue if gcc 4.2 was
remotely close to release. However at the rate regressions are
being fixed (or not) in gcc 4.2 branch, I wouldn't hold my
breath as to which is released first (gcc 4.2 or Leopard).
Once Leopard is released, Darwin8 will become the 'prev
Except this is a different issue as the patch is for Darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00168.html
Geoff appears to have given a workaround for the problem and has
promised to inquire further about more up to date solutions. Another
solution, of course, is to revert the defaul
On Nov 6, 2006, at 8:59 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 20:57 -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
As far as 4.2 this is the first I've heard of it. What's the problem?
Well you need a new cctools which does not exist for 10.2.
While I'm sure you could be less specific, would you
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 20:57 -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
> We're in stage1, breakages happen - see the current fun with gmp/mpfr as
> well as c99 inlining. File a bug or bring a problem up for discussion.
Except this is a different issue as the patch is for Darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 20:57 -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
> As far as 4.2 this is the first I've heard of it. What's the problem?
Well you need a new cctools which does not exist for 10.2.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Right now after patches by the Apple folks causes you to need a
newer
dwarfutils which don't exist outside of Apple so the community of Free
Source and GCC is not helped by making Darwin a primary platform.
Maybe we should list a specific version of darwin which changes the
confusion of whi
13 matches
Mail list logo
