> On 19-May-2021, at 4:12 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> [sending this offlist for now]
>
> Hi Ankur
Hi
>
> I'm mentoring your "Extending C++ support for static analysis pass"
> GSoC project, so I thought I'd say "hi"... or looking at your email
> address should that be "hail"? :-)
XD
>
>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:35 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 17:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:14 AM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 21:18 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM David Malcolm
> > > >
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 17:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:14 AM David Malcolm
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 21:18 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM David Malcolm
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 01:59 +0530, Salo
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:14 AM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 21:18 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 01:59 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Looking at:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 21:18 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM David Malcolm
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 01:59 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
[...]
> > Looking at:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode#Application
> > we don't have a specific format to be follo
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 01:59 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > Hi, apologies for the delayed reply. I was having some college
> > commitments.
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:22 PM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 21:41 +053
On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 01:59 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> Hi, apologies for the delayed reply. I was having some college
> commitments.
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:22 PM David Malcolm
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 21:41 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:42 PM David M
Hi, apologies for the delayed reply. I was having some college commitments.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:22 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 21:41 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:42 PM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:06 +0530, Salo
On Tue, 2021-04-06 at 17:56 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
Hi Ankur.
Various replies inline below throughout.
> > On 30-Mar-2021, at 7:27 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
>
> > > This gave rise to some questions
> > >
> > > 1. why does the analyzer make exceptions with the main() function
> > > ?
> >
> On 30-Mar-2021, at 7:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> This gave rise to some questions
>>
>> 1. why does the analyzer make exceptions with the main() function ?
>
> The user's attention is important - we don't want to spam the user with
> unnecessary reports if we can help it.
make sense.
Hi Krishna,
On 03.04.21 13:52, Krishna Kariya wrote:
I am Krishna, a final-year undergraduate student from India. I am
interested in the project “Fortran – run-time argument checking” for
GSoC 2021. Please share some resources about the project. Please point
to some issues or programming tasks t
On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 21:41 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:42 PM David Malcolm
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 8:03 PM David Malcolm <
> > > dmalc...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
[...snip...]
> > >
> No, it's
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:42 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 8:03 PM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > > Hi, I have tried the following examples with the fanal
Hi Dmitry,
we are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting.
On Mon, Mar 29 2021, Dmitry Torilov via Gcc wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I saw a task on your site for GSoC called < Optimization (LTO) linking>>. I am very interested in it, and I would
> like to know if it is possible to do it th
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:36 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> hello sir
>
> in my quest of finding a bug ( which ended up being a feature ) along
> with it’s source in the analyzer, I tested the code on these 2 code
> snippets and here’s how I went towards it
>
> (1)
> int main()
> {
> int *ptr =
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 8:03 PM David Malcolm
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > Hi, I have tried the following examples with the fanalyzer option
> > > in
> > > g++.
> > >
> > > 1 (a)
> > > void myFu
hello sir
in my quest of finding a bug ( which ended up being a feature ) along with it’s
source in the analyzer, I tested the code on these 2 code snippets and here’s
how I went towards it
(1)
int main()
{
int *ptr = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
return 0;
}
link to running example (h
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 8:03 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > Hi, I have tried the following examples with the fanalyzer option in
> > g++.
> >
> > 1 (a)
> > void myFunction()
> > {
> > char *p =new char;
> > }
> > int main()
> > {
> >fun
On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> Hi, I have tried the following examples with the fanalyzer option in
> g++.
>
> 1 (a)
> void myFunction()
> {
> char *p =new char;
> }
> int main()
> {
> func();
> return 0;
> }
BTW, are you familiar with Compiler Explorer (godbolt
Hi, I have tried the following examples with the fanalyzer option in g++.
1 (a)
void myFunction()
{
char *p =new char;
}
int main()
{
func();
return 0;
}
1(b)
void myFunction()
{
try {
char *p = new char;
throw p;
}
catch(...) {
}
}
int main()
{
myFu
On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 14:52 +0530, Saloni Garg via Gcc wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am an undergraduate student in AMU, Aligarh. I am interested in the
> project* `Extend the static analysis pass`. *I have followed this(
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-March/234941.html) and been
> able to
> succe
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 20 2021, Mahmoud Shawky via Gcc wrote:
> Hello there
> I have chosen the project that i want to develop , and i don't know what is
> the next step ,
we are delighted that you found contributing to GCC interesting. The
next step usually is to discuss your project here on the ma
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 00:31 +0530, Namitha S via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
> I am Namitha S, an undergrad from Amrita University. This mail is
> regarding
> GSOC-2021, I wanted to know more about the project "Extend the static
> analysis pass". I've gone through the wiki and finished the tasks
> listed
> ou
> On 06-Mar-2021, at 6:05 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> If you run the analyzer on your own code, and can trigger a false
> positive or a false negative with the analyzer on it, and try to figure
> out the issue, that could be a useful step (though it might turn out to
> be a difficult one to fi
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 17:04 +0530, Ankur Saini via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Ankur
> While looking for some project to contribute on for GSOC 2021, I came
> across project about extending static analyser pass, especially the
> part that involve adding C++ support to it.
>
> I have already used -fan
Hi Martin,
Thank you very much for the detailed response.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:37 AM Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi Adharsh,
>
> I will be the GSoC organizer for GCC the next year (unless someone else
> wants to be).
>
> On Sun, Dec 20 2020, Adharsh Kamath via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> > I c
Hi Adharsh,
I will be the GSoC organizer for GCC the next year (unless someone else
wants to be).
On Sun, Dec 20 2020, Adharsh Kamath via Gcc wrote:
> Hi everyone
> I came across the list of project ideas that were selected for GSoC 2020
> and I'm interested in contributing to the project regardi
27 matches
Mail list logo
