Ulf Magnusson wrote:
On 11/29/06, Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> While searching for an answer, I noticed that lots of people seem
> to have had problems with cross-compilation that to me look more
> like problems in the documentation, which I find a bit sad.
R
"Ulf Magnusson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd be happy to contribute some documentation on this. I just hope I
> have a firm enough grip on the issue. Where should I send drafts for
> review? Is there some other resource I should be aware of besides
> http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html?
Thank
On 11/29/06, Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> While searching for an answer, I noticed that lots of people seem
> to have had problems with cross-compilation that to me look more
> like problems in the documentation, which I find a bit sad.
Rather than repeatedly
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
While searching for an answer, I noticed that lots of people seem
to have had problems with cross-compilation that to me look more
like problems in the documentation, which I find a bit sad.
Rather than repeatedly complain, the most constructive
contribution would be to co
On 11/29/06, Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of known
> type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case? If you have access to
> a system of that particular type, you can run config.guess to find
> out, b
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of known
type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case? If you have access to
a system of that particular type, you can run config.guess to find
out, but you might not have, and that approach won't work for many
s
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:03:20PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> [ first, this is the wrong list to ask such question, gcc-help is the
> right one ]
I disagree in this case.
> On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> >How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of
> >
On 11/28/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ first, this is the wrong list to ask such question, gcc-help is the
right one ]
On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of
> known type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the gene
[ first, this is the wrong list to ask such question, gcc-help is the
right one ]
On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of
known type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case?
In the general case, you ask someone tha
