On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:42 PM Jeff Chapman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:03 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > Why doesn't the std specify the satisfaction nesting limit in the same
> > way as template instantiation? (at least that's what I infer from your
> > question).
>
> I'm not sure why it'
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:03 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Why doesn't the std specify the satisfaction nesting limit in the same
> way as template instantiation? (at least that's what I infer from your
> question).
I'm not sure why it's not explicitly listed along with the template
instantiation lim
On 10/29/19 4:46 PM, Jeff Chapman wrote:
Hello,
template
concept Foo = requires(T t) { foo(t); };
template
requires Foo
int foo(T t) { return foo(t); }
Similar cases without concepts are handled with
-ftemplate-depth/max_tinst_depth but satisfaction on trunk does not currently
pass throu
2008/12/8 Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm curious as to why I didn't get any responses to my last posts here
> on 29 / 11 / 2008.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-11/
>
Hi Simon,
I have found in the past that larger posts do not get many if any
responses. One thing that might help is to ask
Steven Bosscher wrote:
Don't let yourself be discouraged by a lack of response. This is
unfortunately not uncommon in free/open source software projects.
Actually I think this is less common in floss projects. In both
cases, the best driver is a customer with money, but in the case
of FLOSS pr
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious as to why I didn't get any responses to my last posts here
> on 29 / 11 / 2008.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-11/
>
> Is it that there's just no interest in my additions here?
No, both ideas (-Wres and your exte
