> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> I know that this is very short notice, but if anyone has input about
Mark> whether or not we are ready to branch, that would be very helpful.
FWIW java is in reasonable shape.
I still want to get the x86 Darwin patches in, but that'
Richard Guenther wrote:
The branch date will be no sooner than one week from today, so don't
worry if you don't have time to get me input today. I will revise both
the branch date and 4.3 staging in response to feedback; consider
today's expected mail as a first try.
Do you plan to announce t
On 9/20/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I mentioned in passing last night, I'm reviewing the open GCC 4.2 PRs
and catching up on the mailing list traffic today, with the intent of
announcing a GCC 4.2 branch date later today together with thoughts
about staging the GCC 4.3 contrib
Will be it clean the GCC 4.3 branch's plan?
* Cleaner TreeSSA?
* Cleaner MemSSA?
* Cleaner RTL?
* Cleaner Vectorizing?
* Tail Call?
Best regards
Obtenga su E-mail GRATUITO en http://www.clanomega.com
___
Get your own Web-based E-mail Servi
As I mentioned in passing last night, I'm reviewing the open GCC 4.2 PRs
and catching up on the mailing list traffic today, with the intent of
announcing a GCC 4.2 branch date later today together with thoughts
about staging the GCC 4.3 contributions.
I know that this is very short notice, but
