Re: PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list

2007-11-27 Thread Daniel Berlin
On 11/26/07, Joseph S. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On the other hand, if it is meant for human usage the file list is already a > > clue to spot "wrong" commits. Then, an equivalent but more versatile > > feature > > request would be to have

Re: PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list

2007-11-26 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On the other hand, if it is meant for human usage the file list is already a > clue to spot "wrong" commits. Then, an equivalent but more versatile feature > request would be to have patches visible online, with URLs like > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/?r

Re: PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list

2007-11-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Do people think it is a good idea to have a gcc-cvs-patches list (or gcc-svn-patches, also fine), where all patches automatically get sent to, exactly as they are committed to SVN (maybe in gzip'ed form)? This would have been especially useful before GCC started using SVN, but even today there

PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list

2007-11-26 Thread Steven Bosscher
Hello, Back when God hadn't invented the dinosaurs yet (7 years ago) Joseph opened a bug report requesting the creation of a gcc-cvs-patches mailing list. The bug report can be found here: http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1634. Then, nothing happened for many years, a few comments aside. Joseph wants to ke