Re: On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end.

On 2/9/25 11:34, Nathaniel Shead wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Toon Moene wrote: Compare a standard gcc build: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837664.html with this one using checking=all: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-Febru

Re: On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end.

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Toon Moene wrote: > Compare a standard gcc build: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837664.html > > with this one using checking=all: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837708.html > > Other lan

On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end.

Compare a standard gcc build: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837664.html with this one using checking=all: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837708.html Other languages do not seem to be affected. A sample: FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-he