On 20/03, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
| Maybe that's partly because you are not following closely the development of
| GCC and are not familiar with the GCC stages. Submitting patches during
| stage3 (in particular end of stage3) is not really the most appropriate time,
| so it's often better to wait fo
> - large merges done in a very short period of time
> - no corresponding test cases or non-regression tests
> - no reference to existing PR
> - no closing of corresponding bugzilla entries
I'm sorry, but that's simply wrong. Test cases are posted, and when suitable,
are added to the test
On 20/03, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
| > Since 2007-12-19, which is the date of the latest AdaCore batch
| > merge (three months ago), the Ada front end has only received the
| > following patches:
| >
| > - platform-specific and build-related patches
| >
| > - gigi (Ada structures -> GCC structu
> Since 2007-12-19, which is the date of the latest AdaCore batch
> merge (three months ago), the Ada front end has only received the
> following patches:
>
> - platform-specific and build-related patches
>
> - gigi (Ada structures -> GCC structures) patches from Éric Botcazou
> in *.c fi
> Did you ever get around to looking at my hardware
> interrupt task patch? I know it dates back to Nov/Dec
> but I quite asking about it during stage 2. I submitted
I reviewed it during stage 2 and gave you my comments (the patch was not quite
ready at this time).
> it a couple of times this m
Did you ever get around to looking at my hardware
interrupt task patch? I know it dates back to Nov/Dec
but I quite asking about it during stage 2. I submitted
it a couple of times this month on gcc-patches and
filed this PR so it wouldn't get lost.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
> Still no answer after two PING (December and February, for patches
> submitted in November, and there are others not mentionned here). Is
> there any Ada front-end maintainer handling patches proposals?
Yes, as can be seen by other discussions on other patches.
> Since 2007-12-19, which is the
Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> I cannot seem to find an answer to this PING message from last
> December.
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ada: Do not let a type in an aggregate be an ancestor
> > of itself
> > Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:43:44 +0100
> > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-1
