On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, 21:20 Insurgo via Gcc, wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> Since a couple of days, it seems that http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/ randomly
> points to non-functional mirrors to download coreboot relative packages
> in CI builds.
>
Those is the mailing list for the GC
On 12/30/20 4:18 PM, Insurgo wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> Since a couple of days, it seems that http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/ randomly
> points to non-functional mirrors to download coreboot relative packages
> in CI builds.
>
> I would say that CircleCI fails 2/3 of the time
Hello there,
Since a couple of days, it seems that http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/ randomly
points to non-functional mirrors to download coreboot relative packages
in CI builds.
I would say that CircleCI fails 2/3 of the time in current builds, at
different places.
As you may know, building coreboot
Dear Sir/Madam,
As an enthusiastic user of your software for many years, we would like to do
something in return.
We are very fond of the open source model and we would like to contribute to
this great project.
We have a lot of servers and per request on your website, we would like to
make on
Biener
To: Farid Parpia , overse...@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: "g...@gnu.org"
Date: 06/06/2019 03:51 AM
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: sha512.sum for gcc-7.4.0.tar.gz incorrect on at
least three mirrors
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:32 PM Farid Parpia wrote:
>
>
> Greeti
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:32 PM Farid Parpia wrote:
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> It appears that the given sha512 sum for gcc-7.4.0.tar.gz may be incorrect
> on at least the following mirrors:
>http://mirrors.concertpass.com/
>http://www.netgull.com/
>https://bigse
Greetings,
It appears that the given sha512 sum for gcc-7.4.0.tar.gz may be incorrect
on at least the following mirrors:
http://mirrors.concertpass.com/
http://www.netgull.com/
https://bigsearcher.com/
Regards,
Farid Parpia IBM Corporation: 710-2-RF28, 2455 South Road
like
https://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/gnu/gcc/gcc-8.2.0/) and many others do
not (ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/misc/gcc/releases/gcc-8.2.0/). why?
Should the mirrors not at least host the .sig files, considering that most
mirrors are http (not TLS/SSL) and the downloads can be MITM tampered?
best wishes
alex
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017, Ionut Vatavu wrote:
> I would like to announce a new mirror in Germany Gunzenhausen:
>
> http://www.bothelp.net/mirrors/gcc - updated daily by rsync
Thanks, Ionut.
This is now part of our mirrors list per the patch below.
Gerald
Index: mir
hello,
I would like to announce a new mirror in Germany Gunzenhausen:
http://www.bothelp.net/mirrors/gcc - updated daily by rsync
please update the mirrors list
thanks!
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, niXman wrote:
> mirrors.webhostinggeeks.com/gcc/
This is a little disappointing, though I am inclinded to consider
it a genuine mistake/migration. Addressed like this.
Gerald
Index: mirrors.html
===
RCS file: /
Hi,
mirrors.webhostinggeeks.com/gcc/
But we will keep the USA mirror up indefinitely.
On 9/9/15 10:00 AM, Dan Derebenskiy wrote:
Hi Gerald,
It definitely was not. If it was, then we wouldn't keep the servers
up for a year+ (for some other mirrors, 2+ years)We just
discontinued our mirrors project a week or two ago
Hi Gerald,
It definitely was not. If it was, then we wouldn't keep the servers up
for a year+ (for some other mirrors, 2+ years)We just discontinued
our mirrors project a week or two ago, and haven't had time to contact
everyone yet to take the links down. We will not be
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Gerald, I think we've had similar issues with these mirrors in the
> past as well, shall we just remove them from the list?
>
>> http://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - Online Shop
>> ftp://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - ba
On 09/09/2015 10:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Gerald, I think we've had similar issues with these mirrors in the
past as well, shall we just remove them from the list?
Please do.
jeff
Gerald, I think we've had similar issues with these mirrors in the
past as well, shall we just remove them from the list?
On 9 September 2015 at 17:28, niXman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> http://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - Online Shop
> ftp://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - bad
>
Hi,
http://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - Online Shop
ftp://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - bad
rsync://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - bad
http://mirrors-uk.go-parts.com/gcc/ - Online Shop
ftp://mirrors-uk.go-parts.com/gcc - bad
rsync://mirrors-uk.go-parts.com/gcc - bad
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Dan D. wrote:
> Are you still interested in the mirrors?
Yep. This is the patch I just committed to our web site.
If there are further updates, best propose a patch against
https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html , that is the fastest way
and ensure things show up as you want t
Hi Gerald.
Are you still interested in the mirrors?
Thanks,
Dan & Go-Parts
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Pfeifer
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 11:52 AM
To: Dan D.
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS (small correction)
Hi Dan,
I see there is a later mail
Hi Dan,
I see there is a later mail from Steven which I'm going to look
into wrt. adding the mirrors.
There seems to be a number of you looking into mirroring??
Gerald
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Dan D. wrote:
> I made a small mistake below on the ftp/rsync mirrors for the USA
> mirror.
I made a small mistake below on the ftp/rsync mirrors for the USA mirror. They
should be:
(USA)
http://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc
ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc
rsync://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc
> From: dan1...@msn.com
> To: gcc@gcc.g
Hello,
We previously had these same mirrors up under Go-Part.com but then changed our
domain to Go-Parts.com. The mirror links then dropped off. We apologize deeply
for this, and assure you that this is a one-time event. Going forward, the
mirrors will stay up for a very long time to come, and
Hello,
we created mirrors for GCC. Please add them to your public mirror list:
+ Mirrors-usa:
http://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc/
ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc/
rsync://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/mirrors/gcc/
+ Mirrors-russia:
http://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc/
ftp
Hello,
We wish to host new mirror sites for GCC. Here are the mirrors
that are set up for GCC:
+ Mirrors-usa:
http://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc/
ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc/
rsync://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/mirrors/gcc/
+ Mirrors-ru:
http://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Yuriy Kolesnikov wrote:
> Please provide more information, like here
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors
This is a nice idea. Are you interested in working on it? As you
may know, GCC is a volunteer project and we appreciate any help we
can get also on the infrast
Please provide more information, like here
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Damian Pietras wrote:
> There is probably an outdated information on GnuPG keys at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
Thanks for the report, Damian. Jakub just updated the website, and
you should now find the key having signed the GCC 4.4.0 release there.
Gerald
There is probably an outdated information on GnuPG keys at
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
The newest gcc 4.4.0 (gcc-4.4.0.tar.bz2) is signed using a key not listed
on this page (key ID C3C45C06). I think it's worth to fix this
information.
--
Damian Pietras
http://www.linuxprogrammingblog.com
Ollie Wild wrote:
Just another data point, my git-svn clone of trunk comes in at 414MB,
excluding the size of checked out files. I'm assuming the public svn
is the complete history.
I'm about 35% through the process of cloning the entire gcc repository
via git-svnimport, and the .git directory
On 5/8/07, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> git-svnimport will not pack incrementally as it runs, so it might get
> pretty large. git-svn offers and incremental repack every x commits
> (I chose 1000) and that did wonders for the import time for me.
> Otherwise it will create a huge numbe
git-svnimport will not pack incrementally as it runs, so it might get
pretty large. git-svn offers and incremental repack every x commits
(I chose 1000) and that did wonders for the import time for me.
Otherwise it will create a huge number of files before the final pack.
FYI, doing a repack br
On 5/8/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And today we learn why I think version control systems that think
"repacking" is something the user should be doing are worthless beasts
:)
It generally just means you didn't think through your storage
subsystem enough, but in git's case it's pr
And today we learn why I think version control systems that think
"repacking" is something the user should be doing are worthless beasts
:)
It generally just means you didn't think through your storage
subsystem enough, but in git's case it's probably that the project it
was originally developed f
git-svnimport will not pack incrementally as it runs, so it might get
pretty large. git-svn offers and incremental repack every x commits
(I chose 1000) and that did wonders for the import time for me.
Otherwise it will create a huge number of files before the final pack.
Cheers,
Harvey
On 5/8
Just another data point, my git-svn clone of trunk comes in at 414MB,
excluding the size of checked out files. I'm assuming the public svn
is the complete history.
I'm about 35% through the process of cloning the entire gcc repository
via git-svnimport, and the .git directory is 5.0GB. This in
On 5/8/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the request of a few developers, I set up a mercurial
(http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/) repository that mirrors our SVN
one.
The repo does not currently contain the full history of GCC, but this
is my fault :)
I started the pulling
At the request of a few developers, I set up a mercurial
(http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/) repository that mirrors our SVN
one.
It is updated automatically from SVN every 30 minutes.
Note *only GCC developers have access right now*. I will make it
available by http anonymously soon.
The url
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Marco Rinaudo - Internet.bs Corp. wrote:
> I am pleased to announce 3 new GCC mirrors located in London (UK), Hong
> Kong and Toronto (CANADA), daily resync.
Thanks! These servers seem to be well connected.
> Please feel free to add the 3 mirrors to the officia
Dear Collegues,
I am pleased to announce 3 new GCC mirrors located in London (UK), Hong Kong
and Toronto (CANADA), daily resync.
1) Hong Kong: http://gcc-hk.internet.bs thanks to http://www.internet.bs
(info at internet dot bs)
2) London (UK): http://gcc-uk.internet.bs thanks to http
@@ Key fingerprint = 90AA 4704 69D3 965A 87
France (no snapshots): ftp://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/gcc/";>ftp.lip6.fr, thanks to ftpmaint at lip6
dot fr
France, Brittany: ftp://ftp.irisa.fr/pub/mirrors/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/";>ftp.irisa.fr, thanks
to ftpmaint at irisa dot fr
France, Versai
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> That means they mirror from ftp.gnu.org, rather than gcc.gnu.org.
> Right, but should they all be in the same listing?
You're right, they shouldn't.
I believe I know removed all such mirrors, which really do not mirror
gcc.gnu.
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 11:07]:
> > "weird structure" have a sub-dir for every release, and are missing
> > some of the other dirs (e.g. infrastructure).
> That means they mirror from ftp.gnu.org, rather than gcc.gnu.org.
Right, but should they all be in the same listin
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 16:15]:
> > > ftp://core.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > > structure)
> > > ftp://ftp.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > >
* Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 16:15]:
> > ftp://core.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > structure)
> > ftp://ftp.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > structure)
>
> (When you refer to "weird structure", is this about gcc3.3 r
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I found problems with the following mirrors:
>
> ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ - no longer has a GCC mirror
Thanks for the hint; I just removed this server from our mirrors list.
> ftp://ftp.uvsq.fr/pub/gcc/ - unreachable
>
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html lists a number of mirrors that are no
> longer reachable, doesn't mention that certain mirrors don't have
> snapshots, etc. Can you please investigate.
>
> I found problems with the followi
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html lists a number of mirrors that are no
> longer reachable, doesn't mention that certain mirrors don't have
> snapshots, etc. Can you please investigate.
>
> I found problems with the followi
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html lists a number of mirrors that are no
longer reachable, doesn't mention that certain mirrors don't have
snapshots, etc. Can you please investigate.
I found problems with the following mirrors:
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ - no longer has a GCC
I am working on a project that easily and automatically uses Mirrors and
segmented downloading.
Basically, it is an XML file for storing the many links for a file (FTP,
HTTP, P2P - BitTorrent especially). As you can imagine, this is very useful
for accelerated downloading with download managers
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, george young wrote:
> On the web page:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
>
> the link:
> http://strawberry.resnet.mtu.edu/pub/gcc/
>
> fails: "The requested URL /pub/gcc/ was not found on this server"
Thanks for the hint!
Paul, shall I r
FYI:
On the web page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
the link:
http://strawberry.resnet.mtu.edu/pub/gcc/
fails: "The requested URL /pub/gcc/ was not found on this server"
-- George Young
--
"Are the gods not just?" "Oh no, child.
What would become of us if they were?" (CSL)
52 matches
Mail list logo
